Suppr超能文献

往复式和旋转式系统对术后疼痛的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effect of Reciprocating and Rotary Systems on Postoperative Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

da Silveira Marina Torreão, Batista Shirley Machado, Mamede Veloso Sirley Raiane, de Oliveira Natália Gomes, de Vasconcelos Carvalho Marianne, de Melo Monteiro Gabriela Queiroz

机构信息

Dental School, Universidade de Pernambuco/FOP-UPE, Brazil.

出版信息

Iran Endod J. 2021;16(1):1-16. doi: 10.22037/iej.v16i1.27944.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Our study aimed to compare the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain after endodontic instrumentation with reciprocating and rotary systems.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An electronic literature search was performed with MEDLINE PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from January 2008 to June 2020. Two high-impact endodontic journals were also hand searched. The selection criteria were: 1) ; patients requiring endodontic treatment (primary or secondary), 2) ; endodontic instrumentation with reciprocating versus rotary systems, and 3) ; postoperative pain. We extrapolated all included research data and reported them as dichotomized ordinal variables to evaluate the incidence of pain and continuous variables to assess pain intensity. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated with Inverse Variance method for pain intensity; the incidence of postoperative pain was calculated using relative risk (RR) with the Mantel-Haenszel method. Random-effects model and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for all meta-analyses. The I statistic was used to evaluate the statistical heterogeneity among studies (<0.05).

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles were selected and 17 of them were included in the meta-analysis for the evaluation of postoperative pain in the first 24 h. The meta-analysis was performed in two steps: a) all studies were included; b) subsequently studies with preoperative pain were excluded. A significant difference was observed in the intensity of postoperative pain; with rotary system having more favorable in both steps [a) SMD: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.41; =0.0002; b) SMD: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.58; =0.0010]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of pain, and the incidence of mild, moderate and severe pain (>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis results revealed that rotary system were the instrument of choice as they had lower intensity of postoperative pain. Further controlled studies are advocated to provide clarification for intensity/incidence of postoperative pain in endodontic treatment with mechanized instruments.

摘要

引言

我们的研究旨在比较使用往复式和旋转式系统进行根管治疗器械操作后术后疼痛的发生率和强度。

方法与材料

于2008年1月至2020年6月期间,通过MEDLINE、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行电子文献检索。同时也手动检索了两本高影响力的牙髓病学杂志。选择标准为:1)需要进行根管治疗(初次或二次)的患者;2)使用往复式与旋转式系统进行根管治疗器械操作;3)术后疼痛。我们对所有纳入研究的数据进行外推,并将其报告为二分有序变量以评估疼痛发生率,报告为连续变量以评估疼痛强度。采用逆方差法计算疼痛强度的标准化均数差(SMD);采用Mantel-Haenszel法使用相对危险度(RR)计算术后疼痛发生率。所有荟萃分析均采用随机效应模型和95%置信区间(CI)。I²统计量用于评估研究间的统计异质性(I²<0.05)。

结果

共筛选出21篇文章,其中17篇纳入荟萃分析,以评估术后24小时内的疼痛情况。荟萃分析分两步进行:a)纳入所有研究;b)随后排除术前有疼痛的研究。术后疼痛强度存在显著差异;在两个步骤中,旋转式系统均表现更优[a)SMD:0.27;95%CI:0.13至0.41;P = 0.0002;b)SMD:0.37;95%CI:0.15至0.58;P = 0.0010]。疼痛发生率无显著差异,轻度、中度和重度疼痛的发生率也无显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

荟萃分析结果表明,旋转式系统是首选器械,因为其术后疼痛强度较低。提倡进行进一步的对照研究,以明确使用机械化器械进行根管治疗时术后疼痛的强度/发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959e/9709880/edd3da0498b8/IEJ-16-01-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验