Chauvenet Alienor L M, Kuempel Caitlin D, McGowan Jennifer, Beger Maria, Possingham Hugh P
Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 15;12(2):e0171591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171591. eCollection 2017.
Protected Areas (PAs) are a central part of biodiversity conservation strategies around the world. Today, PAs cover c15% of the Earth's land mass and c3% of the global oceans. These numbers are expected to grow rapidly to meet the Convention on Biological Diversity's Aichi Biodiversity target 11, which aims to see 17% and 10% of terrestrial and marine biomes protected, respectively, by 2020. This target also requires countries to ensure that PAs protect an "ecologically representative" sample of their biodiversity. At present, there is no clear definition of what desirable ecological representation looks like, or guidelines of how to standardize its assessment as the PA estate grows. We propose a systematic approach to measure ecological representation in PA networks using the Protection Equality (PE) metric, which measures how equally ecological features, such as habitats, within a country's borders are protected. We present an R package and two Protection Equality (PE) measures; proportional to area PE, and fixed area PE, which measure the representativeness of a country's PA network. We illustrate the PE metrics with two case studies: coral reef protection across countries and ecoregions in the Coral Triangle, and representation of ecoregions of six of the largest countries in the world. Our results provide repeatable transparency to the issue of representation in PA networks and provide a starting point for further discussion, evaluation and testing of representation metrics. They also highlight clear shortcomings in current PA networks, particularly where they are biased towards certain assemblage types or habitats. Our proposed metrics should be used to report on measuring progress towards the representation component of Aichi Target 11. The PE metrics can be used to measure the representation of any kind of ecological feature including: species, ecoregions, processes or habitats.
保护区是全球生物多样性保护战略的核心组成部分。如今,保护区覆盖了约15%的地球陆地面积和约3%的全球海洋面积。预计这些数字将迅速增长,以实现《生物多样性公约》的爱知生物多样性目标11,该目标旨在到2020年分别保护17%的陆地生物群落和10%的海洋生物群落。该目标还要求各国确保保护区保护其生物多样性的“生态代表性”样本。目前,对于理想的生态代表性是什么样子并没有明确的定义,也没有随着保护区面积的增加如何对其评估进行标准化的指导方针。我们提出了一种系统的方法,使用保护平等(PE)指标来衡量保护区网络中的生态代表性,该指标衡量一个国家境内的生态特征(如栖息地)受到保护的平等程度。我们展示了一个R包和两种保护平等(PE)指标;面积比例PE和固定面积PE,它们衡量一个国家保护区网络的代表性。我们通过两个案例研究来说明PE指标:珊瑚三角区各国和生态区域的珊瑚礁保护,以及世界上六个最大国家的生态区域代表性。我们的结果为保护区网络代表性问题提供了可重复的透明度,并为进一步讨论、评估和测试代表性指标提供了一个起点。它们还突出了当前保护区网络中明显的不足之处,特别是在它们偏向某些生物组合类型或栖息地的地方。我们提出的指标应用于报告在实现爱知目标11的代表性部分方面的进展情况。PE指标可用于衡量任何类型生态特征的代表性,包括:物种、生态区域、过程或栖息地。