• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于保护规划中计算保护平等性的方法。

Methods for calculating Protection Equality for conservation planning.

作者信息

Chauvenet Alienor L M, Kuempel Caitlin D, McGowan Jennifer, Beger Maria, Possingham Hugh P

机构信息

Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Feb 15;12(2):e0171591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171591. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0171591
PMID:28199341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5310882/
Abstract

Protected Areas (PAs) are a central part of biodiversity conservation strategies around the world. Today, PAs cover c15% of the Earth's land mass and c3% of the global oceans. These numbers are expected to grow rapidly to meet the Convention on Biological Diversity's Aichi Biodiversity target 11, which aims to see 17% and 10% of terrestrial and marine biomes protected, respectively, by 2020. This target also requires countries to ensure that PAs protect an "ecologically representative" sample of their biodiversity. At present, there is no clear definition of what desirable ecological representation looks like, or guidelines of how to standardize its assessment as the PA estate grows. We propose a systematic approach to measure ecological representation in PA networks using the Protection Equality (PE) metric, which measures how equally ecological features, such as habitats, within a country's borders are protected. We present an R package and two Protection Equality (PE) measures; proportional to area PE, and fixed area PE, which measure the representativeness of a country's PA network. We illustrate the PE metrics with two case studies: coral reef protection across countries and ecoregions in the Coral Triangle, and representation of ecoregions of six of the largest countries in the world. Our results provide repeatable transparency to the issue of representation in PA networks and provide a starting point for further discussion, evaluation and testing of representation metrics. They also highlight clear shortcomings in current PA networks, particularly where they are biased towards certain assemblage types or habitats. Our proposed metrics should be used to report on measuring progress towards the representation component of Aichi Target 11. The PE metrics can be used to measure the representation of any kind of ecological feature including: species, ecoregions, processes or habitats.

摘要

保护区是全球生物多样性保护战略的核心组成部分。如今,保护区覆盖了约15%的地球陆地面积和约3%的全球海洋面积。预计这些数字将迅速增长,以实现《生物多样性公约》的爱知生物多样性目标11,该目标旨在到2020年分别保护17%的陆地生物群落和10%的海洋生物群落。该目标还要求各国确保保护区保护其生物多样性的“生态代表性”样本。目前,对于理想的生态代表性是什么样子并没有明确的定义,也没有随着保护区面积的增加如何对其评估进行标准化的指导方针。我们提出了一种系统的方法,使用保护平等(PE)指标来衡量保护区网络中的生态代表性,该指标衡量一个国家境内的生态特征(如栖息地)受到保护的平等程度。我们展示了一个R包和两种保护平等(PE)指标;面积比例PE和固定面积PE,它们衡量一个国家保护区网络的代表性。我们通过两个案例研究来说明PE指标:珊瑚三角区各国和生态区域的珊瑚礁保护,以及世界上六个最大国家的生态区域代表性。我们的结果为保护区网络代表性问题提供了可重复的透明度,并为进一步讨论、评估和测试代表性指标提供了一个起点。它们还突出了当前保护区网络中明显的不足之处,特别是在它们偏向某些生物组合类型或栖息地的地方。我们提出的指标应用于报告在实现爱知目标11的代表性部分方面的进展情况。PE指标可用于衡量任何类型生态特征的代表性,包括:物种、生态区域、过程或栖息地。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874e/5310882/295f7a7a2f17/pone.0171591.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874e/5310882/347320f3165e/pone.0171591.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874e/5310882/a75889cef223/pone.0171591.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874e/5310882/309c9f0c4f8c/pone.0171591.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874e/5310882/ef334365fccb/pone.0171591.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874e/5310882/fb54e681884f/pone.0171591.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874e/5310882/295f7a7a2f17/pone.0171591.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874e/5310882/347320f3165e/pone.0171591.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874e/5310882/a75889cef223/pone.0171591.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874e/5310882/309c9f0c4f8c/pone.0171591.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874e/5310882/ef334365fccb/pone.0171591.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874e/5310882/fb54e681884f/pone.0171591.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874e/5310882/295f7a7a2f17/pone.0171591.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Methods for calculating Protection Equality for conservation planning.用于保护规划中计算保护平等性的方法。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 15;12(2):e0171591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171591. eCollection 2017.
2
Socio-economic and ecological impacts of global protected area expansion plans.全球保护区扩张计划的社会经济和生态影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 5;370(1681). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0284.
3
Evaluating and expanding the European Union's protected-area network toward potential post-2020 coverage targets.评估和扩大欧盟的保护区网络,以实现潜在的 2020 年后覆盖目标。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Jun;34(3):654-665. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13479. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
4
Why do mesophotic coral ecosystems have to be protected?为什么要保护中层带珊瑚生态系统?
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 15;726:138456. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138456. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
5
Planning Marine Reserve Networks for Both Feature Representation and Demographic Persistence Using Connectivity Patterns.利用连通性模式规划兼具特征代表性和种群持续性的海洋保护区网络。
PLoS One. 2016 May 11;11(5):e0154272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154272. eCollection 2016.
6
Inland surface waters in protected areas globally: Current coverage and 30-year trends.全球保护区内陆地表水:当前覆盖范围和 30 年变化趋势。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0210496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210496. eCollection 2019.
7
Bolder science needed now for protected areas.现在保护区需要更具魄力的科学。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Apr;30(2):243-8. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12645. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
8
High and far: biases in the location of protected areas.高远:保护区选址的偏倚。
PLoS One. 2009 Dec 14;4(12):e8273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008273.
9
Factors influencing incidental representation of previously unknown conservation features in marine protected areas.影响海洋保护区中先前未知保护特征偶然代表性的因素。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Feb;30(1):154-65. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12557. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
10
Incorporating seascape connectivity in conservation prioritisation.将海景连通性纳入保护优先级考量。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 28;12(7):e0182396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182396. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Habitat prioritization for bat conservation: A case study in Vietnam.蝙蝠保护的栖息地优先排序:越南的一个案例研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 11;20(9):e0331094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331094. eCollection 2025.
2
Habitat Protection Indexes - new monitoring measures for the conservation of coastal and marine habitats.生境保护指数——沿海和海洋生境保护的新监测措施。
Sci Data. 2022 May 12;9(1):203. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01296-4.
3
Areas of global importance for conserving terrestrial biodiversity, carbon and water.具有重要保护意义的全球陆地生物多样性、碳和水的区域。

本文引用的文献

1
The meaning and measurement of size hierarchies in plant populations.植物种群中大小等级结构的含义与测量
Oecologia. 1984 Mar;61(3):334-336. doi: 10.1007/BF00379630.
2
Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity.全球保护区网络在保护海洋生物多样性方面存在不足。
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 3;5:17539. doi: 10.1038/srep17539.
3
Bolder science needed now for protected areas.现在保护区需要更具魄力的科学。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Nov;5(11):1499-1509. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01528-7. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
4
Keeping pace with climate change in global terrestrial protected areas.紧跟全球陆地保护区的气候变化步伐。
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 17;6(25):eaay0814. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay0814. eCollection 2020 Jun.
5
Progress towards a representative network of Southern Ocean protected areas.迈向具有代表性的南大洋保护区网络的进展。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 22;15(4):e0231361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231361. eCollection 2020.
6
Nature representation in South American protected areas: country contrasts and conservation priorities.南美洲保护区的自然表征:国家对比与保护重点
PeerJ. 2019 Jul 1;7:e7155. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7155. eCollection 2019.
7
Assessing threats of non-native species to native freshwater biodiversity: Conservation priorities for the United States.评估外来物种对本地淡水生物多样性的威胁:美国的保护重点
Biol Conserv. 2018 Aug;224:199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.019.
Conserv Biol. 2016 Apr;30(2):243-8. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12645. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
4
Integrating regional conservation priorities for multiple objectives into national policy.将针对多个目标的区域保护重点纳入国家政策。
Nat Commun. 2015 Sep 14;6:8208. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9208.
5
Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity.目标是为濒危生物多样性扩大全球保护区。
PLoS Biol. 2014 Jun 24;12(6):e1001891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001891. eCollection 2014 Jun.
6
Efficiency and equity in land conservation: the effects of policy scale.土地保护的效率与公平:政策规模的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 15;129:190-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
7
Effects of errors and gaps in spatial data sets on assessment of conservation progress.空间数据集误差和空缺对评估保护进展的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2013 Oct;27(5):1000-10. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12095. Epub 2013 Jul 21.
8
A new way to measure the world's protected area coverage.一种新的衡量世界保护区覆盖范围的方法。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024707. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
9
A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity? Yes, it does exist.有没有一种通用的术语来量化物种多样性呢?有的。
Oecologia. 2010 Dec;164(4):853-60. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1812-0. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
10
Dominance and Diversity in Land Plant Communities: Numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution.陆生植物群落的优势与多样性:物种的数量关系反映了竞争在群落功能和进化中的重要性。
Science. 1965 Jan 15;147(3655):250-60. doi: 10.1126/science.147.3655.250.