Tripodi Armando
Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano and IRCCS Cà Granda Maggiore Hospital Foundation, Milano, Italy.
Semin Liver Dis. 2017 Feb;37(1):28-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597770. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
Acute and chronic liver diseases have long been considered prototypes of acquired hemorrhagic diseases. Over the last decade, evidence stemming from the laboratory bench and clinical practice has indicated that hemostasis abnormalities, until recently considered as the cause of bleeding in these conditions, are rebalanced to normal despite the abnormal results of the hemostasis tests such as prothrombin time and platelet counts. Consequently, the commonly used therapeutic approach-the infusion of plasma, platelets, or other prohemostatic agents-are not biologically plausible and should be reconsidered. In this article, the author reviews the evidence supporting the changing paradigm.
急性和慢性肝病长期以来一直被视为获得性出血性疾病的典型代表。在过去十年中,来自实验室研究和临床实践的证据表明,止血异常(直到最近还被认为是这些疾病出血的原因)尽管凝血酶原时间和血小板计数等止血测试结果异常,但已重新平衡至正常。因此,常用的治疗方法——输注血浆、血小板或其他促止血剂——在生物学上是不合理的,应该重新考虑。在本文中,作者回顾了支持这一不断变化的范式的证据。