Suppr超能文献

三种腭裂修复术式的比较:院内发病率

A comparison of three technics of palatorrhaphy: in-hospital morbidity.

作者信息

Wray C, Dann J, Holtmann B

出版信息

Cleft Palate J. 1979 Jan;16(1):42-5.

PMID:282028
Abstract

We report the first randomized prospective comparison of different techniques of palatorrhaphy. The in-hospital morbidity of the Wardill-Kilner repair (Group I), von Langenbeck repair (Group II), and von Langenbeck repair with superiorly based pharyngeal flap (Group III) was evaluated in 47 patients. There were no deaths. Transfusion was needed only in Group I patients (p less than 0.01). Postoperative airway obstruction was significantly more common in Group III patients than in Group I (0 per cent or II (6 per cent) (p less than 0.05). Thus the in-hospital morbidity was least following the von Langenbeck repair.

摘要

我们报告了不同腭裂修复技术的首次随机前瞻性比较。对47例患者评估了Wardill-Kilner修复术(第一组)、冯·兰根贝克修复术(第二组)以及带上方蒂咽瓣的冯·兰根贝克修复术(第三组)的院内发病率。无死亡病例。仅第一组患者需要输血(p<0.01)。第三组患者术后气道梗阻显著比第一组常见(第一组为0%,第二组为6%)(p<0.05)。因此,冯·兰根贝克修复术后的院内发病率最低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验