Lin Man-Xia, Ye Jie-Yi, Tian Wen-Shuo, Xu Ming, Zhuang Bo-Wen, Lu Ming-De, Xie Xiao-Yan, Kuang Ming
Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Institute for the Study of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Apr;62(4):1086-1094. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4312-1. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
Bile duct injury after ablation of malignant liver tumors (MLTs) was not unusual and should be avoided. However, few studies have focused on evaluating the risk factors for intrahepatic bile duct injury.
To evaluate the risk factors for intrahepatic bile duct injury after ablation of MLTs and to evaluate the minimum safe distance for ablating tumors abutting bile ducts.
Sixty-five patients with intrahepatic bile duct injury after ablation of MLTs, and 65 controls were recruited. Risk factors for intrahepatic bile duct injury were analyzed. Tumor location was recorded as ≤5 mm (group A), 5-10 mm (group B), and >10 mm (group C) from the right/left main duct or segmental bile duct.
Ascites history (P < 0.001), TACE treatment history (P = 0.025), intrahepatic bile duct dilatation before ablation (P < 0.001), and tumor location (P = 0.000) were identified as significant risk factors for intrahepatic bile duct injury. Significant differences in the risk of intrahepatic bile duct injury were found between groups B and C (P = 0.000), but not between groups A and B (P = 0.751). Ascites history (P = 0.002) and tumor location (P < 0.001) were independent predictors with the OR (95 % confidence interval) of 39.31(3.95-391.69) and 16.56 (5.87-46.71), respectively.
Bile duct injury after ablation of MLTs was the result of local treatment-related factors combined with the patients' general condition. The minimum safe distance for ablation of tumor abutting a bile duct was 10 mm.
恶性肝肿瘤(MLTs)消融术后胆管损伤并不罕见,应予以避免。然而,很少有研究专注于评估肝内胆管损伤的危险因素。
评估MLTs消融术后肝内胆管损伤的危险因素,并评估消融临近胆管的肿瘤的最小安全距离。
招募65例MLTs消融术后发生肝内胆管损伤的患者及65例对照。分析肝内胆管损伤的危险因素。将肿瘤位置记录为距右/左主肝管或肝段胆管≤5 mm(A组)、5 - 10 mm(B组)和>10 mm(C组)。
腹水病史(P < 0.001)、经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗史(P = 0.025)、消融前肝内胆管扩张(P < 0.001)和肿瘤位置(P = 0.000)被确定为肝内胆管损伤的显著危险因素。B组和C组之间肝内胆管损伤风险存在显著差异(P = 0.000),但A组和B组之间无显著差异(P = 0.751)。腹水病史(P = 0.002)和肿瘤位置(P < 0.001)是独立预测因素,其比值比(95%置信区间)分别为39.31(3.95 - 391.69)和16.56(5.87 - 46.71)。
MLTs消融术后胆管损伤是局部治疗相关因素与患者一般状况共同作用的结果。消融临近胆管的肿瘤的最小安全距离为10 mm。