Suppr超能文献

在心跳死亡后供体的体外肺灌注:作为对扩展/边缘供体肺评估的体外常温肺灌注试验的事后分析。

Ex vivo lung perfusion in donation after circulatory death: A post hoc analysis of the Normothermic Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion as an Assessment of Extended/Marginal Donors Lungs trial.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Center, College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; 88th Surgical Operations Squadron, Wright-Patterson Medical Center, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Sep;168(3):724-734.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.03.011. Epub 2024 Mar 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors offer the ability to expand the lung donor pool and ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) further contributes to this ability by allowing for additional evaluation and resuscitation of these extended criteria donors. We sought to determine the outcomes of recipients receiving organs from DCD EVLP donors in a multicenter setting.

METHODS

This was an unplanned post hoc analysis of a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized trial that took place during 2011 to 2017 with 3 years of follow-up. Patients were placed into 3 groups based off procurement strategy: brain-dead donor (control), brain-dead donor evaluated by EVLP, and DCD donors evaluated by EVLP. The primary outcomes were severe primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours and survival. Secondary outcomes included select perioperative outcomes, and 1-year and 3-years allograft function and quality of life measures.

RESULTS

The DCD EVLP group had significantly higher incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours (P = .03), longer days on mechanical ventilation (P < .001) and in-hospital length of stay (P = .045). Survival at 3 years was 76.5% (95% CI, 69.2%-84.7%) for the control group, 68.3% (95% CI, 58.9%-79.1%) for the brain-dead donor group, and 60.7% (95% CI, 45.1%-81.8%) for the DCD group (P = .36). At 3-year follow-up, presence observed bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome or quality of life metrics did not differ among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although DCD EVLP allografts might not be appropriate to transplant in every candidate recipient, the expansion of their use might afford recipients stagnant on the waitlist a viable therapy.

摘要

目的

心跳停止后捐献(DCD)供者能够扩大肺供者库,而体外肺灌注(EVLP)通过允许对这些扩展标准供者进行额外的评估和复苏,进一步增强了这种能力。我们旨在确定在多中心环境中接受来自 DCD-EVLP 供者器官的受者的结局。

方法

这是一项 2011 年至 2017 年进行的多中心、前瞻性、非随机试验的计划外事后分析,随访时间为 3 年。根据获取策略,患者分为 3 组:脑死亡供者(对照组)、脑死亡供者经 EVLP 评估和 DCD 供者经 EVLP 评估。主要结局是 72 小时时严重原发性移植物功能障碍和存活率。次要结局包括选择围手术期结局以及 1 年和 3 年同种异体移植物功能和生活质量指标。

结果

DCD-EVLP 组在 72 小时时严重原发性移植物功能障碍的发生率显著更高(P =.03),机械通气时间(P <.001)和住院时间(P =.045)更长。3 年生存率为对照组 76.5%(95%CI,69.2%-84.7%),脑死亡供者组 68.3%(95%CI,58.9%-79.1%),DCD 组 60.7%(95%CI,45.1%-81.8%)(P =.36)。在 3 年随访时,各组之间观察到的细支气管炎闭塞综合征或生活质量指标没有差异。

结论

尽管 DCD-EVLP 移植物可能不适合每个候选受者移植,但扩大其使用可能为等待移植名单上的受者提供可行的治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验