Wen Feng, Huang Xueliang
School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, No. 2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210096, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Feb 8;14(2):157. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020157.
The scenario of multiple wireless power transfer (WPT) systems working closely, synchronously or asynchronously with phase difference often occurs in power supply for household appliances and electric vehicles in parking lots. Magnetic field leakage from the WPT systems is also varied due to unpredictable asynchronous working conditions. In this study, the magnetic field leakage from parallel WPT systems working with phase difference is predicted, and the induced electric field and specific absorption rate (SAR) in a human body standing in the vicinity are also evaluated. Computational results are compared with the restrictions prescribed in the regulations established to limit human exposure to time-varying electromagnetic fields (EMFs). The results show that the middle region between the two WPT coils is safer for the two WPT systems working in-phase, and the peripheral regions are safer around the WPT systems working anti-phase. Thin metallic plates larger than the WPT coils can shield the magnetic field leakage well, while smaller ones may worsen the situation. The orientation of the human body will influence the maximum magnitude of induced electric field and its distribution within the human body. The induced electric field centralizes in the trunk, groin, and genitals with only one exception: when the human body is standing right at the middle of the two WPT coils working in-phase, the induced electric field focuses on lower limbs. The SAR value in the lungs always seems to be greater than in other organs, while the value in the liver is minimal. Human exposure to EMFs meets the guidelines of the International Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), specifically reference levels with respect to magnetic field and basic restrictions on induced electric fields and SAR, as the charging power is lower than 3.1 kW and 55.5 kW, respectively. These results are positive with respect to the safe applications of parallel WPT systems working simultaneously.
多个无线电力传输(WPT)系统紧密、同步或异步且存在相位差地工作的情况,在家用电器电源以及停车场电动车辆充电中经常出现。由于不可预测的异步工作条件,WPT系统的磁场泄漏也会有所不同。在本研究中,预测了存在相位差的平行WPT系统的磁场泄漏情况,还评估了站在附近的人体中的感应电场和比吸收率(SAR)。将计算结果与为限制人体暴露于时变电磁场(EMF)而制定的法规规定的限值进行了比较。结果表明,对于同相工作的两个WPT系统,两个WPT线圈之间的中间区域更安全,而对于反相工作的WPT系统,其周围的外围区域更安全。大于WPT线圈的薄金属板能够很好地屏蔽磁场泄漏,而较小的金属板可能会使情况恶化。人体的方位会影响感应电场的最大幅值及其在人体内的分布。感应电场集中在躯干、腹股沟和生殖器部位,只有一个例外:当人体正站在同相工作的两个WPT线圈中间时,感应电场集中在下肢。肺部的SAR值似乎总是大于其他器官,而肝脏中的SAR值最小。当充电功率分别低于3.1kW和55.5kW时,人体暴露于EMF符合国际非电离辐射防护委员会(ICNIRP)的导则,特别是关于磁场的参考水平以及对感应电场和SAR的基本限制。这些结果对于并行同时工作的WPT系统的安全应用是积极的。