Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Clinic I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Hedwig-Krankenhaus, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
J Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec;52(12):1211-1220. doi: 10.1007/s00535-017-1320-7. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
Non-vitamin K dependent oral anticoagulants (NOACs) significantly decrease overall major bleeding rates compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) but there is conflicting evidence regarding the relative risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Since data regarding the types, the management, and the outcome of NOAC-associated gastrointestinal bleeding are scarce, we aimed to fill this gap by comparing cases of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with NOAC, VKA, or antiplatelet therapy.
All major gastrointestinal bleeding events documented in the prospective Dresden NOAC registry were identified, and bleeding location, lesion type, endoscopic treatment, use of blood and coagulation factor transfusion, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality were compared with historical data from a large cohort of consecutive gastrointestinal bleeding patients.
In the 143 NOAC therapy cases, upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding was seen in 44.1%, lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding was seen in 42.0%, and no lesion could be identified in the remaining 14.0%. In contrast, upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding was commoner in the 185 VKA therapy cases (53.0%) and in the 711 antiplatelet therapy cases (68.1%). Among cases with upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding during VKA or antiplatelet therapy, 54.1% and 61.4% respectively presented with ulcers, compared with 27.0% for NOAC therapy. In contrast, hemorrhoid bleeding was the predominant lesion type for lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding with NOAC therapy, with a rate of 33.3%, compared with 10.6% with VKA therapy and 8.7% with antiplatelet therapy. NOAC-associated gastrointestinal bleeding resulted in comparatively low resource consumption, shorter hospitalization, and low in-hospital mortality (1.6%) compared with gastrointestinal bleeding historically seen with use of VKAs (in-hospital mortality 5.6%) or antiplatelet agents (in-hospital mortality 11.9%).
Gastrointestinal bleeding in NOAC recipients is different from that seen with VKA or antiplatelet therapy and has a better short-term prognosis.
与维生素 K 拮抗剂 (VKA) 相比,非维生素 K 依赖性口服抗凝剂 (NOAC) 可显著降低总体大出血发生率,但胃肠道出血的相对风险存在矛盾证据。由于关于 NOAC 相关胃肠道出血的类型、管理和结局的数据稀缺,我们旨在通过比较与 NOAC、VKA 或抗血小板治疗相关的胃肠道出血病例来填补这一空白。
在前瞻性德累斯顿 NOAC 登记处确定了所有记录的主要胃肠道出血事件,并比较了出血部位、病变类型、内镜治疗、血液和凝血因子输注的使用、住院时间和住院死亡率与来自连续胃肠道出血患者的大型队列的历史数据。
在 143 例 NOAC 治疗病例中,上消化道出血占 44.1%,下消化道出血占 42.0%,其余 14.0%无法确定病变。相比之下,在上消化道出血的 185 例 VKA 治疗病例(53.0%)和 711 例抗血小板治疗病例(68.1%)中更为常见。在上消化道出血的 VKA 或抗血小板治疗病例中,分别有 54.1%和 61.4%表现为溃疡,而在 NOAC 治疗病例中为 27.0%。相比之下,对于下消化道出血,NOAC 治疗的主要病变类型是痔出血,占 33.3%,而 VKA 治疗为 10.6%,抗血小板治疗为 8.7%。与历史上使用 VKA(住院死亡率 5.6%)或抗血小板药物(住院死亡率 11.9%)相关的胃肠道出血相比,NOAC 相关胃肠道出血导致资源消耗相对较低,住院时间较短,住院死亡率较低(1.6%)。
NOAC 使用者的胃肠道出血与 VKA 或抗血小板治疗者不同,且短期预后较好。