• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

温度对核果褐腐病菌和链核盘菌引起的腐烂、菌丝体发育及分生孢子盘产生的影响

Influence of temperature on decay, mycelium development and sporodochia production caused by Monilinia fructicola and M. laxa on stone fruits.

作者信息

Bernat M, Segarra J, Xu X-M, Casals C, Usall J

机构信息

IRTA, XaRTA-Postharvest, Edifici Fruitcentre, Parc Científic i Tecnològic Agroalimentari de Lleida, Parc de Gardeny, 25003 Lleida, Catalonia, Spain.

Department of Crop and Forest Sciences, University of Lleida, Avda. Rovira Roure, 191, 25198 Lleida, Catalonia, Spain.

出版信息

Food Microbiol. 2017 Jun;64:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.12.016. Epub 2016 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.fm.2016.12.016
PMID:28213014
Abstract

Brown rot on peaches and nectarines caused by Monilinia spp. results in significant economic losses in Europe. Experiments were conducted to study the effects of temperature (0-33 °C) on the temporal dynamics of decay and mycelium development and the subsequent sporulation on peaches and nectarine fruit infected by M. laxa and M. fructicola. The rates of decay and mycelium development increased with temperature from 0 °C to 25 °C for both Monilinia species. At 0 °C, decay was faster for M. laxa (0.20 cm days) than for M. fructicola (0.07 cm days); indeed, M. laxa was able to develop mycelia and sporodochia, but M. fructicola was not. At 4 and 20 °C, there were no differences in decay and mycelia development between the two Monilinia species. When temperature increased from 25 to 33 °C, the rates of fungal decay and mycelium development decreased. At 30 and 33 °C, M. fructicola decayed faster (0.94 and 1.2 cm days, respectively) than M. laxa (0.78 and 0.74 cm days, respectively) and could develop mycelia and produce sporodochia, whereas M. laxa failed at 33 °C. These results indicated that M. fructicola is better adapted to high temperatures, whereas M. laxa is better adapted to low temperatures. These results can be used to predict the relative importance of the two species during the season at a given site and to improve management strategies for brown rot in areas where both species are present.

摘要

由链核盘菌属(Monilinia spp.)引起的桃和油桃褐腐病在欧洲造成了重大经济损失。开展了实验,以研究温度(0 - 33°C)对桃和油桃果实上由 lax 链核盘菌(M. laxa)和果生链核盘菌(M. fructicola)感染所致腐烂及菌丝体发育的时间动态以及随后产孢的影响。对于这两种链核盘菌,从0°C到25°C,腐烂和菌丝体发育速率均随温度升高而增加。在0°C时,lax 链核盘菌的腐烂速度(0.20厘米/天)比果生链核盘菌(0.07厘米/天)更快;实际上,lax 链核盘菌能够形成菌丝体和分生孢子座,但果生链核盘菌不能。在4°C和20°C时,两种链核盘菌在腐烂和菌丝体发育方面没有差异。当温度从25°C升至33°C时,真菌腐烂和菌丝体发育速率下降。在30°C和33°C时,果生链核盘菌的腐烂速度更快(分别为0.94和1.2厘米/天),高于 lax 链核盘菌(分别为0.78和0.74厘米/天),并且能够形成菌丝体并产生分生孢子座,而 lax 链核盘菌在33°C时无法做到。这些结果表明,果生链核盘菌更适应高温,而 lax 链核盘菌更适应低温。这些结果可用于预测这两个物种在特定地点季节期间的相对重要性,并改善两种物种均存在地区褐腐病的管理策略。

相似文献

1
Influence of temperature on decay, mycelium development and sporodochia production caused by Monilinia fructicola and M. laxa on stone fruits.温度对核果褐腐病菌和链核盘菌引起的腐烂、菌丝体发育及分生孢子盘产生的影响
Food Microbiol. 2017 Jun;64:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.12.016. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
2
Fruit maturity and post-harvest environmental conditions influence the pre-penetration stages of Monilinia infections in peaches.果实成熟度和采后环境条件会影响桃褐腐病菌对桃子侵染的侵入前期阶段。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2017 Jan 16;241:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
3
Growth and aggressiveness factors affecting Monilinia spp. survival peaches.影响桃褐腐病菌生存的生长和侵袭因子。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2016 Jun 16;227:6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.01.023. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
4
A new selective medium for the recovery and enumeration of Monilinia fructicola, M. fructigena, and M. laxa from stone fruits.一种用于从核果中分离和计数桃褐腐病菌、果生链核盘菌和核果链核盘菌的新型选择性培养基。
Phytopathology. 2009 Oct;99(10):1199-208. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-99-10-1199.
5
First Report of Brown Rot of Stone Fruit Caused by Monilinia fructicola in Italy.意大利首次报道由果生链核盘菌引起的核果褐腐病
Plant Dis. 2009 Jun;93(6):668. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-93-6-0668A.
6
Characterization of Monilinia spp. Populations on Stone Fruit in South Italy.意大利南部桃果实上的桑白蚧种群特征。
Plant Dis. 2018 Sep;102(9):1708-1717. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-17-1314-RE. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
7
Identification and Differentiation of Monilinia Species Causing Brown Rot of Pome and Stone Fruit using High-Resolution Melting (HRM) Analysis.利用高分辨率熔解曲线分析(HRM)鉴别和区分引起梨果和核果褐腐病的链核盘菌属菌种
Phytopathology. 2016 Sep;106(9):1055-64. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-01-16-0016-R. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
8
Growth and aggressiveness factors affecting Monilinia spp. survival peaches.影响桃褐腐病菌生存的生长和侵袭因子。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2016 May 2;224:22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
9
Phenotypic plasticity of Monilinia spp. in response to light wavelengths: From in vitro development to virulence on nectarines.Monilinia 种对光波长的表型可塑性:从体外发育到对油桃的致病性。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2022 Jul 16;373:109700. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.109700. Epub 2022 May 10.
10
First Report of Asiatic Brown Rot Caused by Monilinia polystroma on Peach in Italy.意大利首次报道多腔链核盘菌引起桃的亚洲褐腐病。
Plant Dis. 2014 Nov;98(11):1585. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-14-0551-PDN.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of the Potential Distributions of Lindl., , and Their Overlap in China Using MaxEnt.利用最大熵模型预测中国绶草、绶草和绶草的潜在分布及其重叠情况。 需注意,你提供的原文中“Lindl.,, and Their”表述似乎有误,正常应是具体的物种名称等准确内容,这里按现有内容尽量准确翻译了。
J Fungi (Basel). 2023 Jan 31;9(2):189. doi: 10.3390/jof9020189.
2
Genome-Wide Association Study of Brown Rot ( spp.) Tolerance in Peach.桃对褐腐病(多种病原菌)耐受性的全基因组关联研究
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Mar 9;12:635914. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.635914. eCollection 2021.
3
Impact of Postharvest Handling on Preharvest Latent Infections Caused by spp. in Nectarines.
采后处理对油桃中由**(此处原文spp.未完整给出具体物种名)**引起的采前潜伏感染的影响
J Fungi (Basel). 2020 Nov 4;6(4):266. doi: 10.3390/jof6040266.
4
Comparative Microbiome Study of Mummified Peach Fruits by Metagenomics and Metatranscriptomics.基于宏基因组学和宏转录组学的桃木乃伊果实微生物组比较研究
Plants (Basel). 2020 Aug 18;9(8):1052. doi: 10.3390/plants9081052.