Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences Group, United Kingdom.
Norsk Institutt for Vannforskning (NIVA), Gaustadalléen 21, 0349, Oslo, Norway.
Sci Total Environ. 2017 May 15;586:631-641. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.034. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
The cost-effectiveness of six edge-of-field measures for mitigating diffuse pollution from sediment bound phosphorus (P) runoff from temperate arable farmland is analysed at catchment/field scales. These measures were: buffer strips, permanent grassland in the lowest 7% of arable fields, dry detention bunds, wetlands, and temporary barriers such as sediment fences. Baseline field P export was estimated using export coefficients (low risk crops) or a modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (high risk crops). The impact of measures was estimated using simple equations. Costs were estimated from gross margin losses or local data on grants. We used a net cost:benefit (NCB) factor to normalise the costs and impacts of each measure over time. Costs minimisation for target impact was done using PuLP, a linear programming module for Python, across 1634 riparian and non-riparian fields in the Lunan Water, a mixed arable catchment in Eastern Scotland. With all measures in place, average cost-effectiveness increases from £9 to £48/kg P as target P mitigation increases from 500 to 2500kg P across the catchment. Costs increase significantly when the measures available are restricted only to those currently eligible for government grants (buffers, bunds and wetlands). The assumed orientation of the average field slope makes a strong difference to the potential for storage of water by bunds and overall cost-effectiveness, but the non-funded measures can substitute for the extra expense incurred by bunds, where the slope orientation is not suitable. Economic discounting over time of impacts and costs of measures favours those measures, such as sediment fences, which are strongly targeted both spatially and temporally. This tool could be a useful guide for dialogue with land users about the potential fields to target for mitigation to achieve catchment targets.
在流域/田间尺度上分析了 6 种田边措施对于减少来自温带耕地泥沙结合态磷(P)径流的面源污染的成本效益。这些措施包括:缓冲带、耕地中最低处 7%的永久性草地、干滞洪堤、湿地以及临时障碍物如泥沙栅栏。使用出口系数(低风险作物)或改良的通用土壤流失方程(高风险作物)估算基线田间 P 输出。通过简单方程估算措施的影响。成本是根据毛利润损失或当地的补助金数据估算的。我们使用净成本效益(NCB)因子来随时间归一化每种措施的成本和影响。使用 PuLP(一个用于 Python 的线性规划模块)在苏格兰东部混合耕地流域 Lunan Water 的 1634 个河岸和非河岸田间进行目标影响的成本最小化,该流域的目标 P 减排从 500 到 2500kg P 不等。在所有措施到位的情况下,随着目标 P 减排从流域的 500 到 2500kg P 增加,平均成本效益从每公斤 P9 英镑增加到 48 英镑。当可利用的措施仅限于符合政府补助金要求的那些措施(缓冲带、滞洪堤和湿地)时,成本会显著增加。假设的平均田块坡度方向对滞洪堤蓄水和整体成本效益有很大影响,但在坡度方向不适合的情况下,无资金措施可以替代滞洪堤带来的额外费用。随时间推移对措施的影响和成本进行经济贴现有利于那些具有强烈时空针对性的措施,如泥沙栅栏。该工具可以成为与土地使用者就潜在的缓解目标进行对话的有用指南,以实现流域目标。