Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(7):755-761. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 12.
To characterize pediatric caregivers' reasons for 72-hour emergency department (ED) and urgent care (UC) returns.
A sample of caregivers returning within 72 hours of initial visit to a pediatric ED or affiliated UC site was surveyed from November 2014 to June 2015; patients evaluated at outside ED/UC, scheduled for return, or non-English/Spanish speaking were excluded. Caregiver surveys underwent item generation, validation, and pilot testing. Survey items included caregiver reasons for unscheduled returns, with a specific assessment of delivery of key components of discharge instructions (diagnosis, duration of illness, home care, return precautions). Complete delivery of instructions was defined by caregiver reported receipt of instructions on all 4 components.
Of the 500 caregiver surveys analyzed 495 children received a 72-hour return ED/UC visit. Mean age of caregivers was 33 years, 62% completed college. Children were 2 years of age or younger (47%), male (52%), Caucasian (55%), and publicly insured (64%). Reported reasons for ED/UC return included belief that their child's illness had not resolved (51%) or worsened (41%). Many caregivers (41%) were not instructed on all key components of discharge. Almost half of caregivers (47%) were not educated on anticipated duration of illness. Complete delivery of discharge instructions was associated with ED/UC satisfaction (odds ratio, 5.7; 95% confidence interval, 3.8-8.5).
Among caregivers of children returning for an unscheduled ED/UC visit, most do not receive complete discharge instructions at initial visit. Improving delivery of key components of discharge instructions has the potential to increase ED/UC satisfaction and reduce unscheduled 72-hour returns.
描述儿科护理人员因 72 小时内急诊(ED)和紧急护理(UC)返回的原因。
从 2014 年 11 月至 2015 年 6 月,对在儿科 ED 或附属 UC 就诊后 72 小时内再次就诊的护理人员进行抽样调查;排除在外部 ED/UC 接受评估、计划复诊、或不会说英语/西班牙语的患者。护理人员调查问卷经过了项目生成、验证和试点测试。调查问卷的项目包括护理人员非计划性复诊的原因,特别评估了出院指导的关键内容的传递情况(诊断、疾病持续时间、家庭护理、复诊预防措施)。如果护理人员报告收到了所有 4 个部分的指导,即定义为完整的指导传递。
在分析的 500 份护理人员调查中,495 名儿童接受了 72 小时内的 ED/UC 复诊。护理人员的平均年龄为 33 岁,62%的人完成了大学学业。儿童的年龄为 2 岁或以下(47%)、男性(52%)、白种人(55%)和公共保险(64%)。ED/UC 复诊的报告原因包括他们认为孩子的病情没有缓解(51%)或恶化(41%)。许多护理人员(41%)没有得到出院关键内容的指导。近一半的护理人员(47%)没有接受关于预期疾病持续时间的教育。完整的出院指导传递与 ED/UC 满意度相关(优势比,5.7;95%置信区间,3.8-8.5)。
在因非计划性 ED/UC 复诊的儿童的护理人员中,大多数人在初次就诊时没有得到完整的出院指导。改善出院指导的关键内容的传递,有可能提高 ED/UC 的满意度,减少 72 小时内的非计划性复诊。