• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士助产护理的成本:医院环境中干预措施、资源的使用和相关成本。

The Cost of Nurse-Midwifery Care: Use of Interventions, Resources, and Associated Costs in the Hospital Setting.

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco, School of Nursing, San Francisco, California.

Washington State University, Department of Health Policy and Administration, Spokane, Washington.

出版信息

Womens Health Issues. 2017 Jul-Aug;27(4):434-440. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2017.01.002
PMID:28215984
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Obstetrical care often involves multiple expensive, and often elective, interventions that may increase costs to patients, payers, and the health care system with little effect on patient outcomes. The objectives of this study were to examine the following hospital related outcomes: 1) use of labor and birth interventions, 2) inpatient duration of stay, and 3) total direct health care costs for patients attended by a certified nurse-midwife (CNM) compared with those attended by an obstetrician-gynecologist (OB-GYN), within an environment of safe and high-quality care.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Electronic health records for 1,441 medically low-risk women who gave birth at a hospital located in the U.S. Pacific Northwest between January and September 2013 were sampled. Multilevel regression and generalized linear models were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Reduced use of selected labor and birth interventions (cesarean delivery, vacuum-assisted delivery, epidural anesthesia, labor induction, and cervical ripening), reduced maternal duration of stay, and reduced overall costs associated with CNM-led care relative to OB-GYN-led care were observed for medically low-risk women in a hospital setting. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports consideration of increased use of CNMs as providers for the care of women at low risk for complications to decrease costs for the health care system. The use of CNMs to the fullest extent within state-regulated scopes of practice could result in more efficient use of hospital resources.

摘要

简介

产科护理通常涉及多种昂贵的、通常是选择性的干预措施,这些干预措施可能会增加患者、支付方和医疗保健系统的成本,但对患者的结局几乎没有影响。本研究的目的是检查以下与医院相关的结果:1)分娩干预措施的使用情况,2)住院时间,以及 3)在安全且高质量的护理环境下,由认证的注册护士助产士(CNM)护理的患者与由妇产科医生(OB-GYN)护理的患者相比,其直接医疗保健总成本。

材料与方法

抽取了 2013 年 1 月至 9 月期间在美国太平洋西北地区一家医院分娩的 1441 名低危产妇的电子健康记录。采用多水平回归和广义线性模型进行分析。

结果

在医院环境下,与 OB-GYN 护理相比,低危产妇中使用的选择性分娩干预措施(剖宫产、真空辅助分娩、硬膜外麻醉、引产和宫颈成熟)减少,产妇住院时间缩短,与 CNM 护理相关的总体成本降低。母婴结局在各组之间相当。

结论

本研究支持考虑增加 CNM 作为低并发症风险女性护理提供者,以降低医疗保健系统的成本。在州监管的实践范围内充分利用 CNM 可以更有效地利用医院资源。

相似文献

1
The Cost of Nurse-Midwifery Care: Use of Interventions, Resources, and Associated Costs in the Hospital Setting.护士助产护理的成本:医院环境中干预措施、资源的使用和相关成本。
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Jul-Aug;27(4):434-440. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
2
Maternity Outcomes in Manitoba Women: A Comparison between Midwifery-led Care and Physician-led Care at Birth.曼尼托巴省女性的孕产结局:助产士主导护理与医生主导分娩护理的比较。
Birth. 2016 Jun;43(2):108-15. doi: 10.1111/birt.12225. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
3
Relationship Between Hospital-Level Percentage of Midwife-Attended Births and Obstetric Procedure Utilization.医院层面助产士接生比例与产科手术利用情况之间的关系。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):14-22. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12702. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
4
Obstetrician and nurse-midwife collaboration: successful public health and private practice partnership.产科医生和助产士合作:成功的公共卫生和私人执业伙伴关系。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;118(3):663-672. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822ac86f.
5
State Scope of Practice Laws, Nurse-Midwifery Workforce, and Childbirth Procedures and Outcomes.州执业范围法律、助产士劳动力以及分娩程序与结果
Womens Health Issues. 2016 May-Jun;26(3):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
6
Midwife-led care and obstetrician-led care for low-risk pregnancies: A cost comparison.导乐式分娩护理与产科医生主导式分娩护理在低危妊娠中的成本比较。
Birth. 2020 Mar;47(1):57-66. doi: 10.1111/birt.12464. Epub 2019 Nov 3.
7
Cesarean section rates in low-risk private patients managed by certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians.由认证助产士和产科医生管理的低风险私立患者的剖宫产率。
J Nurse Midwifery. 1994 Mar-Apr;39(2):91-7. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(94)90016-7.
8
Economic evaluation of birth care in low-risk women. A comparison between a midwife-led birth unit and a standard obstetric unit within the same hospital in Norway. A randomised controlled trial.低危产妇分娩护理的经济学评价。挪威同一医院内导乐分娩单位与标准产科单位的比较。一项随机对照试验。
Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):591-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
9
Validation of a certified nurse-midwifery database for use in quality monitoring and outcomes research.用于质量监测和结果研究的认证助产士数据库的验证
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Jul-Aug;59(4):438-46. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12107. Epub 2014 May 29.
10
The Collaborative Laborist and Midwifery Model: An Accepted and Sustainable Model.协作式助产士与产科医生模式:一种被认可且可持续的模式。
S D Med. 2018 Dec;71(12):534-537.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review Mapping Economic Evaluations of Midwifery Service Provision and the Midwifery Workforce.一项关于助产服务提供和助产人员劳动力经济评估的范围综述映射研究
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Mar 19. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00962-z.
2
The Effect of Nursing Interventions in Women With Gestational Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.护理干预对妊娠期高血压妇女的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Mar;27(1):e70074. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70074.
3
Effects of a Midwife-Coordinated Maternity Care Intervention (ChroPreg) vs. Standard Care in Pregnant Women with Chronic Medical Conditions: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.
患有慢性疾病的孕妇中助产士协调的孕产期护理干预(ChroPreg)与标准护理的效果:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 25;18(15):7875. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157875.
4
Women's experience and satisfaction with midwife-led maternity care: a cross-sectional survey in China.中国的一项横断面调查:妇女对导乐助产士分娩模式的体验和满意度。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Feb 19;21(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03638-3.
5
Outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean birth by provider type in low-risk women.不同类型医疗提供者实施的低危剖宫产术后试产结局。
Birth. 2020 Mar;47(1):123-134. doi: 10.1111/birt.12474. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
6
The Reliability of Electronic Health Record Data Used for Obstetrical Research.用于产科研究的电子健康记录数据的可靠性
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jan;9(1):156-162. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1627475. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
7
Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: A retrospective cohort study.健康初产妇分娩时医疗服务提供者类型与剖宫产之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Birth. 2018 Jun;45(2):159-168. doi: 10.1111/birt.12334. Epub 2018 Jan 31.