Brusini J, Wang Y, Matos L F, Sylvestre L-S, Bolker B M, Wayne M L
Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, USA.
Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA; Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Evol Ecol Res. 2013;15:883-901.
How does virulence evolve in the /sigma virus (DMelSV) system?
(host) and DMelSV (parasite).
Artificial selection on whole-carcass viral titre of infected flies, including two selection regimes (maternal and biparental transmission) and three treatments within each regime (increased titre, decreased titre, and control). The maternal transmission selection regime lasted for six generations, while the biparental transmission selection regime lasted for twelve generations. We further quantified virulence by estimating the fecundity, viability, and development time of infected flies. Finally, we sequenced virus strains at the end of selection.
Titre is defined here as the number of viral genomes inside a single fly, while virulence is defined as harm to host. We predicted that titre would respond to both increased and decreased selection, that virulence would evolve as a positively correlated response, and that sequence evolution in the viruses would be responsible for these changes. Titre did respond to selection in the biparental regime, although both high and control lines both demonstrated increased titre, while the titre of the low lines did not change. One component of virulence, development time, was positively correlated with titre in the biparental transmission lines (maternal transmission lines were not scored for virulence). However, we detected few (and in some cases, no) genomic changes in the virus, making viral evolution unlikely to be responsible for the response to selection and the association between development time and titre.
在西格玛病毒(黑腹果蝇西格玛病毒,DMelSV)系统中,毒力是如何演变的?
(宿主)黑腹果蝇和DMelSV(寄生虫)。
对受感染果蝇的全虫病毒滴度进行人工选择,包括两种选择方式(母系和双亲传播),每种方式下有三种处理(滴度增加、滴度降低和对照)。母系传播选择方式持续六代,而双亲传播选择方式持续十二代。我们通过估计受感染果蝇的繁殖力、生存力和发育时间来进一步量化毒力。最后,我们在选择结束时对病毒株进行测序。
这里将滴度定义为单个果蝇体内病毒基因组的数量,而毒力定义为对宿主的损害。我们预测滴度会对增加和降低的选择作出反应,毒力会作为一种正相关反应而演变,并且病毒的序列进化将导致这些变化。在双亲传播方式中,滴度确实对选择作出了反应,尽管高滴度组和对照组的滴度都有所增加,而低滴度组的滴度没有变化。在双亲传播系中,毒力的一个组成部分,即发育时间,与滴度呈正相关(母系传播系未对毒力进行评分)。然而,我们在病毒中检测到很少(在某些情况下,没有)基因组变化,这使得病毒进化不太可能是对选择的反应以及发育时间与滴度之间关联的原因。