McCunn Robert, Aus der Fünten Karen, Govus Andrew, Julian Ross, Schimpchen Jan, Meyer Tim
Saarland University, Institute of Sport and Preventive Medicine, Saarbrücken, Germany.
University of Bedfordshire, Institute of Sport Science and Physical Activity, Bedford, United Kingdom.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Feb;12(1):53-66.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The growing volume of movement screening research reveals a belief among practitioners and researchers alike that movement quality may have an association with injury risk. However, existing movement screening tools have not considered the sport-specific movement and injury patterns relevant to soccer. The present study introduces the Soccer Injury Movement Screen (SIMS), which has been designed specifically for use within soccer. Furthermore, the purpose of the present study was to assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the SIMS and determine its suitability for use in further research.
The study utilized a test-retest design to discern reliablility. Twenty-five (11 males, 14 females) healthy, recreationally active university students (age 25.5 ± 4.0 years, height 171 ± 9 cm, weight 64.7 ± 12.6 kg) agreed to participate. The SIMS contains five sub-tests: the anterior reach, single-leg deadlift, in-line lunge, single-leg hop for distance and tuck jump. Each movement was scored out of 10 points and summed to produce a composite score out of 50. The anterior reach and single-leg hop for distance were scored in real-time while the remaining tests were filmed and scored retrospectively. Three raters conducted the SIMS with each participant on three occasions separated by an average of three and a half days (minimum one day, maximum seven days). Rater 1 re-scored the filmed movements for all participants on all occasions six months later to establish the 'pure' intra-rater (intra-occasion) reliability for those movements.
Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values for intra- and inter-rater composite score reliability ranged from 0.66-0.72 and 0.79-0.86 respectively. Weighted kappa values representing the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the individual sub-tests ranged from 0.35-0.91 indicating fair to almost perfect agreement.
Establishing the reliability of the SIMS is a prerequisite for further research seeking to investigate the relationship between test score and subsequent injury. The present results indicate acceptable reliability for this purpose; however, room for further development of the intra-rater reliability exists for some of the individual sub-tests.
2b.
背景/目的:运动筛查研究数量的不断增加表明,从业者和研究人员都认为运动质量可能与受伤风险有关。然而,现有的运动筛查工具尚未考虑与足球相关的特定运动和损伤模式。本研究引入了足球损伤运动筛查(SIMS),该筛查专为足球运动设计。此外,本研究的目的是评估SIMS的评分者内和评分者间信度,并确定其是否适合用于进一步研究。
本研究采用重测设计来确定信度。25名(11名男性,14名女性)健康、有休闲运动习惯的大学生(年龄25.5±4.0岁,身高171±9厘米,体重64.7±12.6千克)同意参与。SIMS包含五个子测试:前伸、单腿硬拉、直线弓步蹲、单腿跳远和收腹跳。每个动作满分为10分,总分50分。前伸和单腿跳远进行实时评分,其余测试进行拍摄并进行回顾性评分。三名评分者对每位参与者进行三次SIMS测试,每次测试间隔平均为三天半(最短一天,最长七天)。六个月后,评分者1对所有参与者所有场合的拍摄动作重新评分,以确定这些动作的“纯”评分者内(场合内)信度。
评分者内和评分者间综合评分信度的组内相关系数(ICC)值分别为0.66 - 0.72和0.79 - 0.86。代表各个子测试评分者内和评分者间信度的加权kappa值范围为0.35 - 0.91,表明一致性为中等至几乎完美。
确定SIMS的信度是进一步研究测试分数与后续损伤之间关系的前提条件。目前的结果表明在此目的下信度是可接受的;然而,部分子测试在评分者内信度方面仍有进一步发展的空间。
2b。