Fitzpatrick Maria D, Jones Damon
Cornell University and NBER.
University of Chicago and NBER.
Econ Educ Rev. 2016 Oct;54:155-172. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
For policymakers aiming to alter the migratory patterns of skilled labor, one potential tool involves subsidizing higher education. We present new evidence on the effects of merit aid scholarship programs - programs that offer partial or full tuition subsidies to high-achieving in-state students. Using Census data on 24 to 32 year olds in the U.S. from 1990 to 2010, we show that eligibility for merit aid programs slightly increases the propensity of state natives to live in-state, while also extending in-state enrollment into the late twenties. However, the share of a cohort both living in-state and having a BA is unchanged, with a possible decline in overall BA attainment. These patterns notwithstanding, the magnitude of merit aid effects is of an order of magnitude smaller than size of the treated population, suggesting that nearly all of the spending on these programs transfers resources to individuals whose ultimate migration decisions remain unchanged.
对于旨在改变技术劳动力迁移模式的政策制定者而言,一种潜在工具是对高等教育进行补贴。我们提供了关于择优奖学金计划效果的新证据,这类计划为成绩优异的本州学生提供部分或全额学费补贴。利用1990年至2010年美国24至32岁人群的人口普查数据,我们发现,有资格获得择优奖学金计划会略微增加本州居民在本州生活的倾向,同时也会将本州入学率延长到快30岁。然而,同一队列中既在本州生活又拥有学士学位的比例没有变化,总体学士学位获得率可能会下降。尽管有这些模式,但择优奖学金效果的规模比受影响人群的规模小一个数量级,这表明这些计划的几乎所有支出都将资源转移给了最终迁移决策没有改变的个人。