Sandefur G D
Demography. 1985 Aug;22(3):353-66.
The results reported here show that the stage of an individual's life cycle not only has direct effects on the likelihood of migration, but also establishes a context within which the motives to migrate are evaluated and acted upon. One contextual impact of the life cycle concerns the effects of length of residence on migration. The results show that the probability of migrating declines more rapidly over time for married males with children than for singles males--i.e., the difference between the likelihood of migration for single males and married males with children widens with increasing length of residence. Much of this difference may be due to the greater number and strength of community ties for individuals who are married with children. These ties are not well developed at the beginning of a residence but continue to strengthen over the course of a residence. In addition, there are variations in the levels of job rewards and location-specific resources across the life cycle and there are two variations across the early life cycle in the effects of independent variables on the initial rate of migration. One resource (self-employment) and one job reward (prestige) have different effects for single individuals than for either group of married males. If the span of the life cycle considered in this analysis were broadened to include older men, additional differences in the effects of independent variables might be uncovered. In research with cross-sectional data containing a wider range of ages than the data used here, Heaton et al. (1981) found that economic variables were more important in determining the migration of younger individuals than that of older individuals, whereas noneconomic factors were more important determinants of the migration of older than of younger individuals. The results of this paper and Heaton's results suggest that at different stages of life people use a somewhat different "subjective cost-benefit calculus" in making migration decisions. The importance of certain migration determinants may vary significantly depending on whether an individual is married, whether he or she has children, and/or whether he or she is in the labor force or retired. Additional research on these issues could greatly contribute to our understanding of migration.
此处报告的结果表明,个人生命周期阶段不仅对迁移可能性有直接影响,还构建了一个评估和践行迁移动机的背景。生命周期的一个背景影响涉及居住时长对迁移的作用。结果显示,有孩子的已婚男性随着时间推移迁移概率下降得比单身男性更快——即,单身男性和有孩子的已婚男性迁移可能性的差异随着居住时长增加而扩大。这种差异很大程度上可能是由于有孩子的已婚人士的社区联系数量更多且更紧密。这些联系在居住初期并不稳固,但会在居住过程中不断加强。此外,在整个生命周期中工作回报水平和特定地点资源存在差异,并且在生命周期早期,自变量对初始迁移率的影响存在两种差异。一种资源(自主创业)和一种工作回报(声望)对单身人士的影响与对两类已婚男性群体的影响不同。如果本分析中考虑的生命周期跨度扩大到包括老年男性,可能会发现自变量影响方面的更多差异。在一项使用比此处所用数据年龄范围更广的横截面数据的研究中,希顿等人(1981年)发现,经济变量在决定年轻人迁移方面比在决定老年人迁移方面更重要,而非经济因素在决定老年人迁移方面比在决定年轻人迁移方面是更重要的决定因素。本文的结果和希顿的结果表明,在人生的不同阶段,人们在做出迁移决策时使用的“主观成本效益计算”略有不同。某些迁移决定因素的重要性可能会因个人是否已婚、是否有孩子以及/或者是否处于劳动力市场或退休状态而有显著差异。对这些问题的进一步研究可能会极大地增进我们对迁移的理解。