• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用微生物评估方案和统计模型对新鲜农产品加工部门食品安全控制与保证活动的微生物性能进行评估

Microbial Performance of Food Safety Control and Assurance Activities in a Fresh Produce Processing Sector Measured Using a Microbial Assessment Scheme and Statistical Modeling.

作者信息

Njage Patrick Murigu Kamau, Sawe Chemutai Tonui, Onyango Cecilia Moraa, Habib I, Njagi Edmund Njeru, Aerts Marc, Molenberghs Geert

机构信息

Department of Food Science, Nutrition and Technology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.

Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

J Food Prot. 2017 Jan;80(1):177-188. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-233.

DOI:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-233
PMID:28221882
Abstract

Current approaches such as inspections, audits, and end product testing cannot detect the distribution and dynamics of microbial contamination. Despite the implementation of current food safety management systems, foodborne outbreaks linked to fresh produce continue to be reported. A microbial assessment scheme and statistical modeling were used to systematically assess the microbial performance of core control and assurance activities in five Kenyan fresh produce processing and export companies. Generalized linear mixed models and correlated random-effects joint models for multivariate clustered data followed by empirical Bayes estimates enabled the analysis of the probability of contamination across critical sampling locations (CSLs) and factories as a random effect. Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes were not detected in the final products. However, none of the processors attained the maximum safety level for environmental samples. Escherichia coli was detected in five of the six CSLs, including the final product. Among the processing-environment samples, the hand or glove swabs of personnel revealed a higher level of predicted contamination with E. coli , and 80% of the factories were E. coli positive at this CSL. End products showed higher predicted probabilities of having the lowest level of food safety compared with raw materials. The final products were E. coli positive despite the raw materials being E. coli negative for 60% of the processors. There was a higher probability of contamination with coliforms in water at the inlet than in the final rinse water. Four (80%) of the five assessed processors had poor to unacceptable counts of Enterobacteriaceae on processing surfaces. Personnel-, equipment-, and product-related hygiene measures to improve the performance of preventive and intervention measures are recommended.

摘要

当前诸如检查、审核和成品检测等方法无法检测微生物污染的分布和动态情况。尽管实施了现行食品安全管理体系,但与新鲜农产品相关的食源性疾病暴发仍时有报道。采用微生物评估方案和统计模型,对肯尼亚五家新鲜农产品加工和出口公司核心控制与保证活动的微生物表现进行了系统评估。针对多变量聚类数据的广义线性混合模型和相关随机效应联合模型,随后进行经验贝叶斯估计,能够将关键采样地点(CSL)和工厂的污染概率作为随机效应进行分析。最终产品中未检测到沙门氏菌属和单核细胞增生李斯特菌。然而,没有一家加工商在环境样本方面达到最高安全水平。在六个CSL中的五个,包括最终产品中,检测到了大肠杆菌。在加工环境样本中,人员的手部或手套擦拭样本显示大肠杆菌的预测污染水平更高,并且在这个CSL中,80%的工厂大肠杆菌呈阳性。与原材料相比,最终产品显示出具有最低食品安全水平的更高预测概率。尽管60%的加工商原材料大肠杆菌呈阴性,但最终产品大肠杆菌呈阳性。进水口水中大肠菌群的污染概率高于最终冲洗水。在五家接受评估的加工商中,有四家(80%)在加工表面的肠杆菌科计数较差或不可接受。建议采取与人员、设备和产品相关的卫生措施,以提高预防和干预措施的效果。

相似文献

1
Microbial Performance of Food Safety Control and Assurance Activities in a Fresh Produce Processing Sector Measured Using a Microbial Assessment Scheme and Statistical Modeling.使用微生物评估方案和统计模型对新鲜农产品加工部门食品安全控制与保证活动的微生物性能进行评估
J Food Prot. 2017 Jan;80(1):177-188. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-233.
2
Semiquantitative analysis of gaps in microbiological performance of fish processing sector implementing current food safety management systems: a case study.对实施现行食品安全管理体系的鱼类加工部门微生物性能差距的半定量分析:案例研究
J Food Prot. 2014 Aug;77(8):1380-9. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-511.
3
Insight into the prevalence and distribution of microbial contamination to evaluate water management in the fresh produce processing industry.了解微生物污染的流行情况和分布,以评估新鲜农产品加工行业的水管理。
J Food Prot. 2012 Apr;75(4):671-81. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-175.
4
Investigation for possible source(s) of contamination of ready-to-eat meat products with Listeria spp. and other pathogens in a meat processing plant in Trinidad.对特立尼达一家肉类加工厂即食肉类产品被李斯特菌属及其他病原体污染的可能来源进行调查。
Food Microbiol. 2006 Jun;23(4):359-66. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2005.05.008. Epub 2005 Jul 25.
5
Performance of food safety management systems in poultry meat preparation processing plants in relation to Campylobacter spp. contamination.家禽肉制备加工厂食品安全管理体系对弯曲杆菌污染的性能。
J Food Prot. 2010 Aug;73(8):1447-57. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-73.8.1447.
6
Microbiological performance of dairy processing plants is influenced by scale of production and the implemented food safety management system: a case study.乳制品加工厂的微生物学性能受生产规模和实施的食品安全管理体系的影响:案例研究。
J Food Prot. 2013 Jun;76(6):975-83. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-450.
7
Microbial ecology of food contact surfaces and products of small-scale facilities producing traditional sausages.生产传统香肠的小型设施的食品接触表面及产品的微生物生态学
Food Microbiol. 2008 Apr;25(2):313-23. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2007.10.001. Epub 2007 Oct 6.
8
Contribution of Farm-level Hygiene and Handling Practices to Microbial Safety Profiles in the Informal Dairy Sector in Zimbabwe.津巴布韦非正规乳品行业农场级卫生和处理操作对微生物安全状况的影响。
J Food Prot. 2024 Aug;87(8):100313. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100313. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
9
A 3-year hygiene and safety monitoring of a meat processing plant which uses raw materials of global origin.对一家使用全球原材料的肉类加工厂进行了为期 3 年的卫生和安全监测。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2015 Sep 16;209:60-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.12.028. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
10
Coliforms and prevalence of Escherichia coli and foodborne pathogens on minimally processed spinach in two packing plants.两家包装厂中最少加工菠菜上的大肠菌群、大肠杆菌和食源性病原体的情况及流行率
J Food Prot. 2008 Dec;71(12):2398-403. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-71.12.2398.