Dimakopoulou Eleni, Zacharogiannis Elias, Chairopoulou Chrysoula, Kaloupsis Socratis, Platanou Theodoros
Department of Aquatic Sports, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Science, University of Athens, Athens, Greece -
Department of Track and Field, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Science, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018 Jul-Aug;58(7-8):1006-1013. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.06976-6. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
This study compared the effects of self-selected (SSP), negative (NPS), and even pacing strategy (EPS) on performance time, and kinetic and physiological variables in overall 2-km rowing and in first and second 1 km.
Fifteen male rowers (15.37±1.34 years) realized four tests: an incremental test on a rowing ergometer to determine their VO2peak and three experimental 2-km rowing race, where first 1 km was manipulated. From SSP a negative pacing strategy, 4% slower than the mean velocity of SSP, and an even pacing strategy (EPS) with mean velocity of SSP, were developed.
High stroke rate and better performance time were observed in SSP. Fstr and Fpeak decreased, whereas performance time increased, in SSP and EPS from first to second 1 km. However, performance time, stroke rate and Pst in NPS presented better values (P=0.001) with the exception of decreased stroke length (P=0.03). There was an increase in physiological responses in all pacing strategies from first to second 1 km (P=0.001). Performance time, stroke rate and Fstr were better in SSP and EPS compared to NPS in first 1 km (P=0.001). VE, VE/VO2, VCO2 were better in SSP and EPS compared to NPS (P=0.001) in both first and second 1 km. Stroke length was smaller in SSP compared to NPS and EPS in second 1 km (P=0.001).
SSP (parabolic-shaped profile) allowed rowers to cover the 2-km distance at higher stroke rate and in shorter performance time compared to negative and even pacing strategies presenting same physiological responses.
本研究比较了自我选择配速策略(SSP)、消极配速策略(NPS)和均匀配速策略(EPS)对2公里全程赛艇以及前1公里和后1公里的成绩时间、动力学和生理变量的影响。
15名男性赛艇运动员(15.37±1.34岁)进行了四项测试:在赛艇测功仪上进行递增测试以确定其最大摄氧量,以及三项2公里赛艇实验性比赛,其中前1公里的配速进行了调整。从自我选择配速策略中衍生出一种消极配速策略,比自我选择配速策略的平均速度慢4%,以及一种平均速度与自我选择配速策略相同的均匀配速策略(EPS)。
在自我选择配速策略中观察到较高的划桨频率和更好的成绩时间。从第一公里到第二公里,自我选择配速策略和均匀配速策略中的最大功率和峰值功率降低,而成绩时间增加。然而,消极配速策略中的成绩时间、划桨频率和推进力呈现出更好的值(P=0.001),除了划桨长度减小(P=0.03)。从第一公里到第二公里,所有配速策略中的生理反应均增加(P=0.001)。在前1公里中,自我选择配速策略和均匀配速策略的成绩时间、划桨频率和最大功率比消极配速策略更好(P=0.001)。在第一公里和第二公里中,自我选择配速策略和均匀配速策略的每分通气量、每分通气量与摄氧量之比、二氧化碳排出量均比消极配速策略更好(P=0.001)。在第二公里中,自我选择配速策略的划桨长度比消极配速策略和均匀配速策略更小(P=0.001)。
与呈现相同生理反应的消极配速策略和均匀配速策略相比,自我选择配速策略(抛物线形曲线)使赛艇运动员能够以更高的划桨频率和更短的成绩时间完成2公里赛程。