Suppr超能文献

三种用于确定水平子午线方向上眼球旋转的不同角膜标记方法的比较。

A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian.

作者信息

Lin Hung-Yuan, Fang Yi-Ting, Chuang Ya-Jung, Karlin Justin N, Chen Hsin-Yang, Lin Szu-Yuan, Lin Pi-Jung, Chen Ming

机构信息

Universal Eye Center, Zhong-Li, Taiwan, Republic of China; Department of Optometry, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China; Department of Ophthalmology, Fu-Jian Medical University, People's Republic of China.

Universal Eye Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb 8;11:311-315. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S124580. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

During toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, surgeons must take particular care to ensure that inaccurate preoperative measurement and intraoperative misalignment do not cause unexpected postoperative residual astigmatism. This retrospective, comparative case series study aimed to analyze the rotational deviation, or cyclotorsion, of three corneal marking methods: VERION digital marker (VDM; reference), horizontal slit beam marking (HSBM), and subjective direct visual marking (SDVM) on the table (using a bevel knife tip). Subjects included 81 eyes of 61 patients (mean age: 65.70±13.14 years; range: 32-91 years) undergoing scheduled cataract surgery. A preoperative reference image was taken of each eye. Subsequently, a slit lamp with the light beam turned to the horizontal meridian was used to align the seated patient's head, and two reference marks were placed at the 3- and 9-o'clock positions of the corneal limbus using a 27-gauge needle and marking pen (HSBM). Upon transfer to the surgical table, the VDM was used to display a real-time dial scale on the patient's eye, with the entrance of the temporal clear corneal incision (CCI) at 0° (horizontal meridian). Simultaneously, a bevel knife tip was used to create a marker based on the surgeon's visual determination of the temporal 0° point (SDVM). We used the VDM to quantitatively evaluate the accuracy of axis alignment via deviation from the horizontal reference meridian. Compared with the reference meridian, the SDVM (-3.46°±7.32°, range: -18° to 13°) exhibited greater average relative cyclotorsion versus the HSBM (0.41°±4.92°, range: -10° to 10°). Furthermore, the mean average misalignment was significantly less in the HSBM group versus the SDVM group (=4.179, <0.001). The VDM is likely a reliable marking method, similar to the HSBM. In contrast, the SDVM is not entirely reliable. The VDM usage may prevent inaccurate preoperative manual marking during toric IOL implantation.

摘要

在植入散光人工晶状体(IOL)期间,外科医生必须格外小心,以确保术前测量不准确和术中对准错误不会导致术后意外的残余散光。这项回顾性、比较性病例系列研究旨在分析三种角膜标记方法的旋转偏差或旋转扭转:VERION数字标记(VDM;参考)、水平裂隙光束标记(HSBM)和手术台上的主观直接视觉标记(SDVM,使用斜角刀尖)。研究对象包括61例计划进行白内障手术患者的81只眼睛(平均年龄:65.70±13.14岁;范围:32 - 91岁)。为每只眼睛拍摄术前参考图像。随后,使用光束转向水平子午线的裂隙灯来对准就座患者的头部,并使用27号针和标记笔在角膜缘的3点和9点位置放置两个参考标记(HSBM)。转移到手术台上后,使用VDM在患者眼睛上显示实时刻度盘,颞侧透明角膜切口(CCI)的入口位于0°(水平子午线)。同时,使用斜角刀尖根据外科医生对颞侧0°点的视觉判断创建一个标记(SDVM)。我们使用VDM通过与水平参考子午线的偏差来定量评估轴对准的准确性。与参考子午线相比,SDVM(-3.46°±7.32°,范围:-18°至13°)相对于HSBM(0.41°±4.92°,范围:-10°至10°)表现出更大的平均相对旋转扭转。此外,HSBM组的平均对准误差明显小于SDVM组(=4.179,<0.001)。VDM可能是一种可靠的标记方法,类似于HSBM。相比之下,SDVM并不完全可靠。使用VDM可能会防止在散光IOL植入期间术前手动标记不准确。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4fd/5308567/ea47ac7b42a8/opth-11-311Fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验