• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学实践中的合法权威观念。

The Idea of Legitimate Authority in the Practice of Medicine.

作者信息

Applbaum Arthur Isak

机构信息

Adams Professor of Political Leadership and Democratic Values at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2017 Feb 1;19(2):207-213. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.sect1-1702.

DOI:10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.sect1-1702
PMID:28225702
Abstract

Legitimate authority is the normative power to govern, where a normative power is the ability to change the normative situation of others. Correlatively, when one has the normative power to govern others, these others face a normative liability to be governed. So understood, physicians do not have legitimate authority over their patients, and patients do not have legitimate authority over their physicians. An authority is legitimate only when it is a free group agent constituted by its free members. On this conception, associations of physicians sometimes have legitimate authority over individual physicians, and physicians sometimes count as members subject to the legitimate authority of these associations. This might be so even when they have not consented to membership.

摘要

合法权威是一种治理的规范性权力,其中规范性权力是改变他人规范处境的能力。相应地,当一个人拥有治理他人的规范性权力时,这些他人就面临着被治理的规范性责任。照此理解,医生对其患者不具有合法权威,患者对其医生也不具有合法权威。只有当权威是由其自由成员构成的自由群体主体时,它才是合法的。按照这种观念,医生协会有时对个体医生拥有合法权威,而医生有时也被视为受这些协会合法权威约束的成员。即便他们并未同意成为成员,情况也可能如此。

相似文献

1
The Idea of Legitimate Authority in the Practice of Medicine.医学实践中的合法权威观念。
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Feb 1;19(2):207-213. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.sect1-1702.
2
Take this medicine: the legality of prescription incentive schemes.服用此药:处方激励计划的合法性。
Med Law Rev. 2010 Autumn;18(3):417-26. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwq022.
3
Strategies for Acing the Fundamentals and Mitigating Legal and Ethical Consequences of Poor Physician-Patient Communication.掌握医患沟通基本要素及减轻沟通不善导致的法律和伦理后果的策略。
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;19(3):289-295. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.3.hlaw1-1703.
4
An ophthalmology code of ethics in Canada: enhancing our practice patterns.加拿大眼科伦理准则:改进我们的执业模式。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;50(4):253-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.04.013.
5
Industry relationships with physicians under scrutiny.医药行业与医生之间的关系受到审视。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2008 Nov-Dec;15(6):737-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03007352.
6
Research on Medical Practices and the Patient-Physician Relationship: What Can Regulators Learn from Patients?医学实践与医患关系研究:监管机构能从患者身上学到什么?
AMA J Ethics. 2015 Dec 1;17(12):1160-5. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.12.pfor2-1512.
7
[Doctor in the podium. Recommendations to appear as an expert in the court].[医生站在讲台上。关于作为专家出庭的建议]
Med Clin (Barc). 2008 Apr 19;130(14):536-41. doi: 10.1157/13119716.
8
Overcoming Legal Impediments to Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment.克服医生下达维持生命治疗医嘱的法律障碍。
AMA J Ethics. 2016 Sep 1;18(9):861-8. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.9.peer1-1609.
9
Law, Ethics, and Conversations between Physicians and Patients about Firearms in the Home.法律、伦理以及医生与患者之间关于家中枪支的对话。
AMA J Ethics. 2018 Jan 1;20(1):69-76. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.1.hlaw1-1801.
10
Understanding Gosport.了解戈斯波特。
BMJ. 2018 Aug 8;362:k3422. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3422.

引用本文的文献

1
The legal path for priority setting in Chile: a critical analysis to improve health planning and stewardship.智利制定优先事项的法律途径:改善卫生规划和管理的批判性分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 8;11:1302640. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1302640. eCollection 2023.
2
Physicians' Lived Experience of Breaking Bad News in Clinical Practice: Five Essentials of a Relational Process.医生在临床实践中传递坏消息的体验:关系过程的五个要素。
Qual Health Res. 2023 Dec;33(14):1349-1359. doi: 10.1177/10497323231197534. Epub 2023 Oct 4.