• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断犯罪与诊断疾病:法医与临床科学中的偏见减少策略

Diagnosing Crime and Diagnosing Disease: Bias Reduction Strategies in the Forensic and Clinical Sciences.

作者信息

Lockhart Joseph J, Satya-Murti Saty

机构信息

Forensic Services Division, California Department of State Hospitals, 1305 North "H" Street, #117, Lompoc, CA.

Health Policy Consultant, 2534 Knightbridge Drive, Santa Maria, CA, 93455.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2017 Nov;62(6):1534-1541. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13453. Epub 2017 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1111/1556-4029.13453
PMID:28230894
Abstract

Cognitive effort is an essential part of both forensic and clinical decision-making. Errors occur in both fields because the cognitive process is complex and prone to bias. We performed a selective review of full-text English language literature on cognitive bias leading to diagnostic and forensic errors. Earlier work (1970-2000) concentrated on classifying and raising bias awareness. Recently (2000-2016), the emphasis has shifted toward strategies for "debiasing." While the forensic sciences have focused on the control of misleading contextual cues, clinical debiasing efforts have relied on checklists and hypothetical scenarios. No single generally applicable and effective bias reduction strategy has emerged so far. Generalized attempts at bias elimination have not been particularly successful. It is time to shift focus to the study of errors within specific domains, and how to best communicate uncertainty in order to improve decision making on the part of both the expert and the trier-of-fact.

摘要

认知努力是法医决策和临床决策的重要组成部分。这两个领域都会出现错误,因为认知过程复杂且容易产生偏差。我们对导致诊断错误和法医错误的认知偏差的英文全文文献进行了选择性综述。早期研究(1970 - 2000年)集中于对偏差进行分类并提高偏差意识。最近(2000 - 2016年),重点已转向“去偏差”策略。虽然法医学专注于控制误导性的情境线索,但临床去偏差努力则依赖于清单和假设情景。到目前为止,尚未出现单一的普遍适用且有效的偏差减少策略。消除偏差的一般性尝试并不特别成功。现在是时候将重点转向特定领域内错误的研究,以及如何最好地传达不确定性,以改善专家和事实认定者的决策。

相似文献

1
Diagnosing Crime and Diagnosing Disease: Bias Reduction Strategies in the Forensic and Clinical Sciences.诊断犯罪与诊断疾病:法医与临床科学中的偏见减少策略
J Forensic Sci. 2017 Nov;62(6):1534-1541. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13453. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
2
Diagnosing Crime and Diagnosing Disease-II: Visual Pattern Perception and Diagnostic Accuracy.诊断犯罪与诊断疾病-II:视觉模式感知与诊断准确性
J Forensic Sci. 2018 Sep;63(5):1429-1434. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13735. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
3
Blinding or information control in diagnosis: could it reduce errors in clinical decision-making?诊断中的盲法或信息控制:它能减少临床决策中的错误吗?
Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 Nov 27;5(4):179-189. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0030.
4
Debiasing versus knowledge retrieval checklists to reduce diagnostic error in ECG interpretation.去偏与知识检索检查表相结合,以减少心电图解读中的诊断错误。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 Aug;24(3):427-440. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09875-8. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
5
Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review.法医学中的认知偏差研究:一项系统综述。
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Apr;297:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
6
Needed: consensus and classification for terms used in cognitive, forensic and clinical bias discussions.需求:在认知、法医和临床偏差讨论中使用的术语的共识和分类。
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Dec;293:e10-e11. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.09.028. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
7
[Cognitive errors in diagnostic decision making].[诊断决策中的认知错误]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2017 Oct;167(13-14):333-342. doi: 10.1007/s10354-017-0570-6. Epub 2017 May 23.
8
Teaching Critical Thinking: A Case for Instruction in Cognitive Biases to Reduce Diagnostic Errors and Improve Patient Safety.教授批判性思维:以认知偏差教学减少诊断错误和提高患者安全的案例。
Acad Med. 2019 Feb;94(2):187-194. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002518.
9
Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook.评估法医决策中的认知偏差:综述与展望
J Forensic Sci. 2020 Mar;65(2):354-360. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14220. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
10
Commentary on: Lockhart JJ, Satya-Murti S. Diagnosing crime and diagnosing disease: bias reduction strategies in the forensic and clinical sciences. J Forensic Sci 2017;62(6):1534-41.
J Forensic Sci. 2018 Mar;63(2):651-653. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13734.

引用本文的文献

1
'Anyone who commits such a cruel crime, must be criminally irresponsible': context effects in forensic psychological assessment.“任何犯下如此残忍罪行的人,必定是刑事责任能力缺失的”:法医心理评估中的情境效应
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Jul 13;29(4):506-515. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1938272. eCollection 2022.
2
The charm of structural neuroimaging in insanity evaluations: guidelines to avoid misinterpretation of the findings.结构性神经影像学在精神障碍评估中的魅力:避免误解研究结果的指南。
Transl Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 26;8(1):227. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0274-8.
3
Epidermis and Enamel: Insights Into Gnawing Criticisms of Human Bitemark Evidence.
表皮与牙釉质:对人类咬痕证据的尖锐批评之洞察
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2018 Jun;39(2):87-97. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000392.