• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教授批判性思维:以认知偏差教学减少诊断错误和提高患者安全的案例。

Teaching Critical Thinking: A Case for Instruction in Cognitive Biases to Reduce Diagnostic Errors and Improve Patient Safety.

机构信息

C.S. Royce is instructor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. M.M. Hayes is assistant professor, Department of Medicine, Shapiro Institute for Education and Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. R.M. Schwartzstein is professor, Department of Medicine, Shapiro Institute for Education and Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2019 Feb;94(2):187-194. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002518.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002518
PMID:30398993
Abstract

Diagnostic errors contribute to as many as 70% of medical errors. Prevention of diagnostic errors is more complex than building safety checks into health care systems; it requires an understanding of critical thinking, of clinical reasoning, and of the cognitive processes through which diagnoses are made. When a diagnostic error is recognized, it is imperative to identify where and how the mistake in clinical reasoning occurred. Cognitive biases may contribute to errors in clinical reasoning. By understanding how physicians make clinical decisions, and examining how errors due to cognitive biases occur, cognitive bias awareness training and debiasing strategies may be developed to decrease diagnostic errors and patient harm. Studies of the impact of teaching critical thinking skills have mixed results but are limited by methodological problems.This Perspective explores the role of clinical reasoning and cognitive bias in diagnostic error, as well as the effect of instruction in metacognitive skills on improvement of diagnostic accuracy for both learners and practitioners. Recent literature questioning whether teaching critical thinking skills increases diagnostic accuracy is critically examined, as are studies suggesting that metacognitive practices result in better patient care and outcomes. Instruction in metacognition, reflective practice, and cognitive bias awareness may help learners move toward adaptive expertise and help clinicians improve diagnostic accuracy. The authors argue that explicit instruction in metacognition in medical education, including awareness of cognitive biases, has the potential to reduce diagnostic errors and thus improve patient safety.

摘要

诊断错误导致多达 70%的医疗错误。预防诊断错误比在医疗保健系统中建立安全检查更为复杂;它需要了解批判性思维、临床推理以及做出诊断的认知过程。当发现诊断错误时,必须确定临床推理中的错误发生在何处以及如何发生。认知偏差可能导致临床推理错误。通过了解医生如何做出临床决策,并检查由于认知偏差而导致的错误如何发生,可以开发认知偏差意识培训和去偏策略,以减少诊断错误和患者伤害。教授批判性思维技能的影响研究结果喜忧参半,但受到方法学问题的限制。本观点探讨了临床推理和认知偏差在诊断错误中的作用,以及元认知技能教学对学习者和从业者提高诊断准确性的影响。最近有文献质疑教授批判性思维技能是否会提高诊断准确性,同时也有研究表明元认知实践会带来更好的患者护理和结果。元认知、反思实践和认知偏差意识的教学可能有助于学习者走向适应性专业知识,并帮助临床医生提高诊断准确性。作者认为,在医学教育中明确教授元认知,包括对认知偏差的认识,有可能减少诊断错误,从而提高患者安全性。

相似文献

1
Teaching Critical Thinking: A Case for Instruction in Cognitive Biases to Reduce Diagnostic Errors and Improve Patient Safety.教授批判性思维:以认知偏差教学减少诊断错误和提高患者安全的案例。
Acad Med. 2019 Feb;94(2):187-194. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002518.
2
Review of the Basics of Cognitive Error in Emergency Medicine: Still No Easy Answers.急诊医学中认知错误基础的回顾:仍无简单答案。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Nov 2;21(6):125-131. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.7.47832.
3
Cognitive Debiasing Strategies: A Faculty Development Workshop for Clinical Teachers in Emergency Medicine.认知去偏策略:面向急诊医学临床教师的教师发展研讨会
MedEdPORTAL. 2017 Oct 23;13:10646. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10646.
4
Diagnostic decision-making and strategies to improve diagnosis.诊断决策制定与改善诊断的策略。
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013 Oct;43(9):232-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2013.07.003.
5
The Causes of Errors in Clinical Reasoning: Cognitive Biases, Knowledge Deficits, and Dual Process Thinking.临床推理错误的原因:认知偏差、知识缺陷和双过程思维。
Acad Med. 2017 Jan;92(1):23-30. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001421.
6
Promoting cognitive and metacognitive reflective reasoning skills in nursing practice: self-regulated learning theory.在护理实践中促进认知和元认知反思推理技能:自我调节学习理论
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Feb;45(4):381-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02921.x.
7
Diagnostic errors and flaws in clinical reasoning: mechanisms and prevention in practice.临床推理中的诊断错误和缺陷:实践中的机制和预防。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Oct 23;142:w13706. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13706. eCollection 2012.
8
[Cognitive errors in diagnostic decision making].[诊断决策中的认知错误]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2017 Oct;167(13-14):333-342. doi: 10.1007/s10354-017-0570-6. Epub 2017 May 23.
9
The ethical imperative to think about thinking - diagnostics, metacognition, and medical professionalism.思考思考的伦理要求——诊断、元认知与医学职业精神。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2014 Oct;23(4):386-96. doi: 10.1017/S0963180114000061. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
10
Diagnostic errors and reflective practice in medicine.医学中的诊断错误与反思性实践。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;13(1):138-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00638.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Academic competition-based learning cultivates scientific literacy to promote professional competitiveness in medical undergraduates.基于学术竞赛的学习培养医学生的科学素养,以提升其专业竞争力。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 3;13:1590832. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1590832. eCollection 2025.
2
The implementation challenge of computerised clinical decision support systems for the detection of disease in primary care: systematic review and recommendations.基层医疗中用于疾病检测的计算机化临床决策支持系统的实施挑战:系统评价与建议
Implement Sci. 2025 Jul 17;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01445-4.
3
Association of critical thinking disposition with personality traits and differentiation of self in medical undergraduates, a multicenter cross-sectional study in China.
中国一项多中心横断面研究:医学本科生批判性思维倾向与人格特质及自我分化的关联
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 17;12:1561786. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1561786. eCollection 2025.
4
A Structured Approach to Mitigating Cognitive Bias in Educational Assessment.一种减轻教育评估中认知偏差的结构化方法。
J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Apr;17(2):136-139. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00734.1. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
5
Preoperative Transthoracic Echocardiogram Comprehensiveness and Diagnostic Errors in Patients Undergoing Congenital Heart Surgery.先天性心脏病手术患者术前经胸超声心动图的全面性及诊断错误
Pediatr Cardiol. 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1007/s00246-025-03886-6.
6
How Malpractice and Error Cases Influence Information Recall in General Practice Residents, a Vignette Study.医疗事故和差错案例如何影响全科住院医师的信息回忆:一项案例研究
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Apr 29;14(1):194-207. doi: 10.5334/pme.1730. eCollection 2025.
7
Factors influencing patient safety competence among Chinese vocational nursing students: A mixed-methods study using COM-B model and theoretical domains framework.影响中国职业护理学生患者安全能力的因素:一项使用COM-B模型和理论领域框架的混合方法研究
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Feb 15;8:100307. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100307. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Enhancing collaborative clinical reasoning among multidisciplinary healthcare teams in a neurosurgery ICU: insights from video-reflexive ethnography.加强神经外科重症监护病房多学科医疗团队之间的协作临床推理:来自视频反思民族志的见解
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 8;25(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06782-y.
9
I'm Not the Doctor for You: Cognitive Bias, Complex Illness, and a Moral Imperative.我不是适合你的医生:认知偏差、复杂疾病与道德责任。
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2025 Jan 8;14:27536130241311594. doi: 10.1177/27536130241311594. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
10
Developing clinical reasoning along the cognitive continuum: a mixed methods evaluation of a novel Clinical Diagnosis Assessment.沿着认知连续体培养临床推理能力:一项新型临床诊断评估的混合方法评价
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 8;25(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06613-6.