Tai Shu-Yu, Chen Chun-Hung, Chien Chen-Yu, Yang Yuan-Han
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Department of Family Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
BMC Neurol. 2017 Feb 23;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0800-y.
Combination therapy using acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) and cilostazol is of unknown efficacy for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD).
We explored the therapeutic responses by using a case-control study, which was conducted in Taiwan. We enrolled 30 participants with stable AD who were receiving cilostazol (50 mg) twice per day as an add-on therapy combined with AChEIs, and 30 participants as controls who were not receiving cilostazol as an add-on therapy. The therapeutic responses were measured using neuropsychological assessments and analyzed in relation to cilostazol use, apolipoprotein E genotype, and demographic characteristics. Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and clinical dementia rating sum of boxes (CDR-SB) were administered at the outset of the study and 12 months later. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association between the therapeutic response and cilostazol use.
For the therapeutic indicator of cognition, Cilostazol use (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.03-0.80), initial CDR-SB score (aOR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.31-3.72), and initial MMSE score (aOR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.11-1.90), but not age, sex, education, or ApoE ε4 status, were significantly associated with poor therapeutic outcomes. For the therapeutic indicator of global status, no significant association was observed between the covariates and poor therapeutic outcomes.
Cilostazol may reduce the decline of cognitive function in stable AD patients when applied as an add-on therapy.
乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂(AChEIs)与西洛他唑联合治疗对阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的疗效尚不清楚。
我们采用病例对照研究方法在台湾进行研究,以探讨治疗反应。我们招募了30名接受西洛他唑(50毫克)每日两次作为AChEIs联合附加治疗的病情稳定的AD患者,以及30名未接受西洛他唑附加治疗的患者作为对照。使用神经心理学评估来测量治疗反应,并分析其与西洛他唑使用、载脂蛋白E基因型和人口统计学特征的关系。在研究开始时和12个月后进行简易精神状态检查(MMSE)和临床痴呆评定量表总和(CDR-SB)。采用多因素logistic回归分析来估计治疗反应与西洛他唑使用之间的关联。
对于认知治疗指标,使用西洛他唑(调整优势比(aOR)=0.17,95%置信区间(CI)=0.03-0.80)、初始CDR-SB评分(aOR=2.06,95%CI=1.31-3.72)和初始MMSE评分(aOR=1.41,95%CI=1.11-1.90),而非年龄、性别、教育程度或ApoE ε4状态,与不良治疗结果显著相关。对于整体状态治疗指标,未观察到协变量与不良治疗结果之间存在显著关联。
西洛他唑作为附加治疗应用于病情稳定的AD患者时,可能会减缓认知功能下降。