Suppr超能文献

精神科医生对患有严重精神疾病的患者的共病躯体疾病了解程度如何?——一项横断面二次数据分析

To what extent are psychiatrists aware of the comorbid somatic illnesses of their patients with serious mental illnesses? - a cross-sectional secondary data analysis.

作者信息

Dornquast Christina, Tomzik Juliane, Reinhold Thomas, Walle Matthias, Mönter Norbert, Berghöfer Anne

机构信息

Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstrasse 57, 10117, Berlin, Germany.

IVPNetworks GmbH, Lübecker Str. 126, 22087, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 23;17(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2106-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Somatic comorbidities are a serious problem in patients with severe mental illnesses. These comorbidities often remain undiagnosed for a long time. In Germany, physicians are not allowed to access patients' health insurance data and do not have routine access to documentation from other providers of health care. Against this background, the objective of this article was to investigate psychiatrists' knowledge of relevant somatic comorbidities in their patients with severe mental illnesses.

METHODS

Cross-sectional secondary data analysis was performed using primary data from a prospective study evaluating a model of integrated care of patients with serious mental illnesses. The primary data were linked with claims data from health insurers. Patients' diagnoses were derived on the basis of the ICD-10 and the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. Diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease (CAD), hyperlipidaemia, glaucoma, osteoporosis, polyarthritis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were selected for evaluation. We compared the number of diagnoses reported in the psychiatrists' clinical report forms with those in the health insurance data.

RESULTS

The study evaluated records from 1,195 patients with severe mental illnesses. The frequency of documentation of hypertension ranged from 21% in claims data to 4% in psychiatrists' documentation, for COPD from 12 to 0%, respectively, and for diabetes from 7 to 2%, respectively. The percentage of diagnoses deduced from claims data but not documented by psychiatrists ranged from 68% for diabetes and 83% for hypertension, to 90% for CAD to 98% for COPD.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of psychiatrists participating in the integrated care programme were insufficiently aware of the somatic comorbidities of their patients. We support allowing physicians to access patients' entire medical records to increase their knowledge of patients' medical histories and, consequently, to increase the safety and quality of care.

摘要

背景

躯体共病是严重精神疾病患者面临的一个严重问题。这些共病往往长期未被诊断出来。在德国,医生无权获取患者的健康保险数据,也无法常规获取其他医疗服务提供者的病历资料。在此背景下,本文旨在调查精神科医生对其严重精神疾病患者相关躯体共病的了解情况。

方法

使用来自一项前瞻性研究的原始数据进行横断面二次数据分析,该前瞻性研究评估了严重精神疾病患者综合护理模式。原始数据与健康保险公司的理赔数据相关联。患者的诊断依据国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)和解剖治疗学化学分类系统(ATC)得出。选取糖尿病、高血压、冠状动脉疾病(CAD)、高脂血症、青光眼、骨质疏松症、多关节炎和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)进行评估。我们将精神科医生临床报告表中报告的诊断数量与健康保险数据中的诊断数量进行了比较。

结果

该研究评估了1195例严重精神疾病患者的记录。高血压的记录频率在理赔数据中为21%,在精神科医生的记录中为4%;COPD的记录频率分别为12%和0%;糖尿病的记录频率分别为7%和2%。从理赔数据推断但未被精神科医生记录的诊断百分比,糖尿病为68%,高血压为83%,CAD为90%,COPD为98%。

结论

参与综合护理项目的大多数精神科医生对其患者的躯体共病了解不足。我们支持允许医生查阅患者的完整病历,以增加他们对患者病史的了解,从而提高护理的安全性和质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验