• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低风险男性根治性前列腺切除术时盆腔淋巴结清扫模式

Patterns of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy for Low-risk Men.

作者信息

Chalfin Heather J, Feng Zhaoyong, Trock Bruce J, Partin Alan W

机构信息

James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD.

James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Urology. 2017 Jun;104:143-149. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.037. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.037
PMID:28232176
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine nationwide patterns of lymph node dissection (LND) in men with D'Amico low-risk prostate cancer, including the rate of detected lymph node metastasis and factors associated with the decision to perform LND. Existing guidelines recommend against LND at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) in low-risk men, yet this is still a common practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 2013 National Cancer Database includes 1,208,180 cases of prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2013. Of these, 50,245 met D'Amico low-risk criteria, had complete clinicopathologic data, and underwent RP. Mixed effects multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify hospital and treatment characteristics independently associated with LND, extended LND, and the detection of lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

A total of 20,556 men (40.9%) underwent LND and 4360 (8.7%) had extended LND. Lymph node metastasis was present in 76 cases (0.37%). On multivariable analysis, robotic vs open RP had odds ratio (OR) = 0.16 (0.14-0.17), P < .0001, for LND, and surgery at an academic center had OR = 1.76 (1.33-2.33), P < .0001, for LND. Men on Medicaid were less likely than the privately insured to undergo LND, and the highest earners were most likely to undergo LND. In multivariable analysis, race was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis, with black men having the highest rates (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

LND is performed in nearly half of low-risk men, more commonly during open surgery at academic centers, yet metastasis is discovered less than 1% of the time. Guidelines suggest that percentage core involvement should be considered, but if the overall risk of metastasis is low, LND should not be performed.

摘要

目的

研究全国范围内D’Amico低危前列腺癌男性患者的淋巴结清扫(LND)模式,包括检测到的淋巴结转移率以及与LND决策相关的因素。现有指南不建议在低危男性患者行根治性前列腺切除术(RP)时进行LND,但这仍是一种常见的做法。

材料与方法

2013年国家癌症数据库包含2004年至2013年间诊断的1,208,180例前列腺癌病例。其中,50,245例符合D’Amico低危标准,具有完整的临床病理数据,并接受了RP。采用混合效应多变量逻辑回归模型来确定与LND、扩大LND以及淋巴结转移检测独立相关的医院和治疗特征。

结果

共有20,556名男性(40.9%)接受了LND,4360名(8.7%)接受了扩大LND。76例(0.37%)存在淋巴结转移。在多变量分析中,机器人辅助RP与开放RP相比,LND的比值比(OR)=0.16(0.14 - 0.17),P <.0001;在学术中心进行手术,LND的OR = 1.76(1.33 - 2.33),P <.0001。参加医疗补助计划的男性比参加私人保险的男性接受LND的可能性更小,收入最高的人群接受LND的可能性最大。在多变量分析中,种族与淋巴结转移显著相关,黑人男性的转移率最高(P <.0001)。

结论

近一半的低危男性接受了LND,在学术中心进行开放手术时更为常见,但转移的发现率不到1%。指南建议应考虑癌芯累及百分比,但如果转移的总体风险较低,则不应进行LND。

相似文献

1
Patterns of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy for Low-risk Men.低风险男性根治性前列腺切除术时盆腔淋巴结清扫模式
Urology. 2017 Jun;104:143-149. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.037. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
2
The Effect of Lymph Node Dissection in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of Survival and Early Postoperative Outcomes.根治性前列腺切除术治疗转移性前列腺癌患者淋巴结清扫的影响:生存和术后早期结局的当代分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Sep;2(5):541-548. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
3
Racial disparities in lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database analysis.根治性前列腺切除术中淋巴结清扫的种族差异:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库分析。
Int J Urol. 2018 Nov;25(11):929-936. doi: 10.1111/iju.13780. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
4
Head-to-head comparison of lymph node density and number of positive lymph nodes in stratifying the outcome of patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer submitted to radical prostatectomy and extended lymph node dissection.在接受根治性前列腺切除术和扩大淋巴结清扫术的淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者中,对淋巴结密度和阳性淋巴结数量进行分层,以比较其结局的头对头比较。
Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):29.e21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.10.009. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
5
Effect of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with D'Amico Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Study.扩展盆腔淋巴结清扫术对接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的 D'Amico 中高危前列腺癌患者肿瘤学结局的影响:一项多机构研究。
J Urol. 2020 Feb;203(2):338-343. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000504. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
6
Utilization and impact of surgical technique on the performance of pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.手术技术在根治性前列腺切除术中对盆腔淋巴结清扫操作的应用及影响:来自共享平等准入区域癌症医院数据库的结果
Int J Urol. 2016 Mar;23(3):241-6. doi: 10.1111/iju.13027. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
7
Variation in pelvic lymph node dissection among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy by hospital characteristics and surgical approach: results from the National Cancer Database.根据医院特征和手术方式,接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者盆腔淋巴结清扫情况的差异:来自国家癌症数据库的结果
J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):820-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.019. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
8
Long-term outcomes of salvage lymph node dissection for clinically recurrent prostate cancer: results of a single-institution series with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.对于临床复发的前列腺癌患者行挽救性淋巴结清扫术的长期疗效:单机构系列研究结果,随访时间至少 5 年。
Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):299-309. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
9
Adherence to pelvic lymph node dissection recommendations according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network pelvic lymph node dissection guideline and the D'Amico lymph node invasion risk stratification.根据美国国立综合癌症网络盆腔淋巴结清扫指南和达米科淋巴结侵犯风险分层,遵循盆腔淋巴结清扫建议。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Feb;36(2):81.e17-81.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
10
Extent of lymph node dissection improves survival in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy without lymph node invasion.在接受根治性前列腺切除术且无淋巴结侵犯的前列腺癌患者中,淋巴结清扫范围可提高生存率。
Prostate. 2018 May;78(6):469-475. doi: 10.1002/pros.23491. Epub 2018 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilization of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.盆腔淋巴结清扫术在接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗的低风险前列腺癌患者中的应用。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Dec;15(6):e1001-e1006. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 May 10.