• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

真假难辨?电动牙刷比手动牙刷更有效。

Fact or Fiction? Powered Toothbrushing is More Effective than Manual Toothbrushing.

作者信息

Goh Edwin X J, Lim Lum Peng

出版信息

Oral Health Prev Dent. 2017;15(1):23-32. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a37710.

DOI:10.3290/j.ohpd.a37710
PMID:28232971
Abstract

PURPOSE

To answer the question of whether powered toothbrushing is more effective than manual toothbrushing, this paper reviews various aspects of powered toothbrushes in terms of efficacy, safety, acceptability and special considerations for certain patient groups. Future research directions and gaps in the current knowledge are also discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The literature review was conducted using PubMed. A hand search of the references of the retrieved articles was also performed.

RESULTS

Powered toothbrushes have been found to be as effective as manual toothbrushes in removing plaque and reducing gingival inflammation. They are safe with no adverse effects on hard or soft tissues. Among the powered toothbrushes, there is evidence to suggest that rotation-oscillation toothbrushes may be more effective than others. The results seem to suggest that certain special-needs patient groups, such as the elderly and the disabled, may benefit from the use of powered toothbrushes.

CONCLUSION

Powered toothbrushes are as effective as manual toothbrushes in facilitating oral hygiene. They may be recommended for certain patient groups to improve the efficacy of oral hygiene measures. More data on the safety and acceptability of powered toothbrushes are necessary.

摘要

目的

为回答电动牙刷是否比手动牙刷更有效的问题,本文从功效、安全性、可接受性以及特定患者群体的特殊考虑等方面对电动牙刷进行了综述。还讨论了未来的研究方向以及当前知识的空白。

材料与方法

使用PubMed进行文献综述。还对手检检索到的文章的参考文献进行了搜索。

结果

已发现电动牙刷在去除牙菌斑和减轻牙龈炎症方面与手动牙刷一样有效。它们是安全的,对硬组织或软组织均无不良影响。在电动牙刷中,有证据表明旋转振荡式牙刷可能比其他牙刷更有效。结果似乎表明,某些特殊需求的患者群体,如老年人和残疾人,可能会从使用电动牙刷中受益。

结论

电动牙刷在促进口腔卫生方面与手动牙刷一样有效。对于某些患者群体,可推荐使用电动牙刷以提高口腔卫生措施的功效。需要更多关于电动牙刷安全性和可接受性的数据。

相似文献

1
Fact or Fiction? Powered Toothbrushing is More Effective than Manual Toothbrushing.真假难辨?电动牙刷比手动牙刷更有效。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2017;15(1):23-32. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a37710.
2
[Evaluation of the efficacy of powered and manual toothbrushes in preventing oral diseases (Systematic review with meta-analysis)].电动牙刷与手动牙刷预防口腔疾病效果的评估(系统评价与Meta分析)
Fogorv Sz. 2016 Mar;109(1):3-22.
3
Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health.手动刷牙与电动刷牙对口腔健康的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD002281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002281.
4
Manual versus powered toothbrushes: what is the evidence?手动牙刷与电动牙刷:证据有哪些?
Dent Update. 2006 Apr;33(3):159-62. doi: 10.12968/denu.2006.33.3.159.
5
The effectiveness of manual versus powered toothbrushes for dental health: a systematic review.手动牙刷与电动牙刷对口腔健康的有效性:一项系统评价。
J Dent. 2004 Mar;32(3):197-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.11.006.
6
Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health.手动刷牙与电动刷牙对口腔健康的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD002281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002281.pub2.
7
Moderate quality evidence finds statistical benefit in oral health for powered over manual toothbrushes.中等质量证据表明,电动牙刷在口腔健康方面比手动牙刷具有统计学上的优势。
Evid Based Dent. 2014 Sep;15(3):77-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401041.
8
Powered versus manual toothbrushes for plaque removal and gingival health amongst 55 and older individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.电动牙刷与手动牙刷在 55 岁及以上人群中对菌斑清除和牙龈健康的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spec Care Dentist. 2024 Jul-Aug;44(4):979-989. doi: 10.1111/scd.12974. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
9
Short-term and long-term effectiveness of powered toothbrushes in promoting periodontal health during orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.电动牙刷在正畸治疗期间促进牙周健康的短期和长期效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Dec;152(6):753-766.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.09.003.
10
A Thirty-Day Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the Rowenta, Braun and Sonicare Powered Toothbrushes and a Manual Toothbrush.Rowenta、博朗和飞利浦声波震动牙刷与手动牙刷的30天安全性和有效性评估。
J Clin Dent. 1997;8(4):120-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Pilot study of the effectiveness and acceptability of an automatic toothbrush among residents in long-term care.长期护理居民中自动牙刷效果和可接受性的初步研究。
Spec Care Dentist. 2024 Sep;44(5):1399-1407. doi: 10.1111/scd.12996. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
2
Comparison of oral health behaviour between dental and non-dental undergraduates in a university in southwestern China--exploring the future priority for oral health education.中国西南部某高校口腔医学生与非口腔医学生口腔健康行为比较——探索口腔健康教育的未来重点。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Sep 7;20(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01232-1.