Maehara Yoshihiko, Shirabe Ken, Kohnoe Shunji, Emi Yasunori, Oki Eiji, Kakeji Yoshihiro, Baba Hideo, Ikeda Masataka, Kobayashi Michiya, Takayama Tadatoshi, Natsugoe Shoji, Haraguchi Masashi, Yoshida Kazuhiro, Terashima Masanori, Sasako Mitsuru, Yamaue Hiroki, Kokudo Norihiro, Uesaka Katsuhiko, Uemoto Shinji, Kosuge Tomoo, Sawa Yoshiki, Shimada Mitsuo, Doki Yuichiro, Yamamoto Masakazu, Taketomi Akinobu, Takeuchi Masahiro, Akazawa Kouhei, Yamanaka Takeharu, Shimokawa Mototsugu
Department of Surgery and Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Surg Today. 2017 Sep;47(9):1060-1071. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1480-3. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
The use of absorbable sutures in wound closure has been shown to reduce the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI); however, there is no evidence that the intra-abdominal use of absorbable rather than silk sutures reduces the incidence of SSI after gastrointestinal surgery. We report the findings of a phase II trial, designed to evaluate the impact of the intra-abdominal use of absorbable sutures on the incidence of SSI.
At 19 Japanese hospitals, 1147 patients undergoing elective gastrectomy, colorectal surgery, hepatectomy, or pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) were randomly assigned to absorbable or silk intra-abdominal suture groups. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of SSI. The secondary efficacy endpoints were the locations of SSI, time to resolution of SSI, length of hospital stay, and the incidence of bile leakage in hepatectomy and pancreatic fistula.
The incidence of SSI was 11.3%, 15.5%, 11.3%, and 36.9% after gastrectomy, colorectal surgery, hepatectomy, and PD, respectively. The incidence of SSI was higher in the absorbable suture group than in the silk suture group for all the surgical procedures, but the difference was not significant.
The intra-abdominal use of absorbable sutures did not have enough of an effect on the reduction of SSI in this phase II trial to justify the planning of a large-scale phase III trial.
已证明在伤口缝合中使用可吸收缝线可降低手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率;然而,没有证据表明在胃肠手术后腹腔内使用可吸收缝线而非丝线能降低SSI的发生率。我们报告了一项II期试验的结果,该试验旨在评估腹腔内使用可吸收缝线对SSI发生率的影响。
在19家日本医院,1147例行择期胃切除术、结直肠手术、肝切除术或胰十二指肠切除术(PD)的患者被随机分配至腹腔内使用可吸收缝线组或丝线组。主要疗效终点是SSI的发生率。次要疗效终点包括SSI的发生部位、SSI的缓解时间、住院时间以及肝切除术中胆漏和胰瘘的发生率。
胃切除术、结直肠手术、肝切除术和PD术后SSI的发生率分别为11.3%、15.5%、11.3%和36.9%。在所有手术中,可吸收缝线组的SSI发生率均高于丝线组,但差异无统计学意义。
在这项II期试验中,腹腔内使用可吸收缝线对降低SSI的效果不足以支持开展大规模III期试验。