Suppr超能文献

评估新型口服抗凝药与华法林用于心房颤动复律的效果:一家三级转诊中心的经验

Evaluating cardioversion outcomes for atrial fibrillation on novel oral anticoagulants versus warfarin: experience at a tertiary referral centre.

作者信息

Sharif Z, Srinivas B, Tiedt I, Ryan N, Awadalla M, Sullivan V, Foley D P, Gumbrielle T, McAdam B, Sheahan R G

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Road, Dublin 9, Ireland.

School of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2017 Aug;186(3):615-620. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1582-3. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend anticoagulation prior to cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation of >48 h or unknown duration to reduce thromboembolic risk. Therapeutic anticoagulation with warfarin, with INR between 2 and 3, is consistently achieved in approximately 60% of patients.

AIMS

We evaluated outcomes and assessed differences in direct current cardioversion (DCCV) in patients treated with warfarin and novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) at our institution.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of consecutive DCCV at a tertiary referral over 18 months was conducted. Analysis of cardioversion records allowed completion of a standardised dataset. Clinical variables recorded included (1) CHADSVASC score, (2) anticoagulant use, and (3) bleeding complications.

RESULTS

During this period 187 DCCVs were scheduled; 119 on warfarin and 68 on NOAC. DCCV was deferred in 26% (n = 31) of the warfarin group and 4.4% (n = 3) of the NOAC group (p = 0.0002). The average time interval between referral and DCCV was 144.43 and 109.32 days for the warfarin and NOAC groups, respectively (p value = 0.023). 7.56% (n = 9) of the warfarin population had a bleeding event compared to a 2.94% total bleeding rate in NOAC group (p = 0.213). Deferral of elective DCCV and additional anticoagulant monitoring was estimated at €1160 per procedure.

CONCLUSION

In elective cardioversions, the group anticoagulated with NOAC was less likely to have subtherapeutic anticoagulation and hence deferred procedures and had reduced health care consumption when compared to the group anticoagulated with warfarin.

摘要

背景

当前指南建议,对于房颤持续时间超过48小时或持续时间不明的患者,在心脏复律前进行抗凝治疗,以降低血栓栓塞风险。使用华法林进行治疗性抗凝,国际标准化比值(INR)维持在2至3之间,大约60%的患者能够持续达到这一标准。

目的

我们评估了在本机构接受华法林和新型口服抗凝剂(NOAC)治疗的患者进行直流电心脏复律(DCCV)的结果并评估了差异。

方法

对一家三级转诊机构18个月内连续进行的DCCV进行回顾性分析。通过分析心脏复律记录来完成标准化数据集。记录的临床变量包括:(1)CHADSVASC评分;(2)抗凝剂使用情况;(3)出血并发症。

结果

在此期间,共安排了187次DCCV;119次使用华法林,68次使用NOAC。华法林组26%(n = 31)的患者DCCV被推迟,NOAC组为4.4%(n = 3)(p = 0.0002)。华法林组和NOAC组从转诊到DCCV的平均时间间隔分别为144.43天和109.32天(p值 = 0.023)。华法林组7.56%(n = 9)的患者发生了出血事件,而NOAC组的总出血率为2.94%(p = 0.213)。每次手术因择期DCCV推迟和额外的抗凝监测估计花费1160欧元。

结论

在择期心脏复律中,与使用华法林抗凝的组相比,使用NOAC抗凝的组发生抗凝不足并因此推迟手术的可能性较小,且医疗消耗更低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验