Schneider Erich H, Seifert Roland
Institute of Pharmacology, Medical School of Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2017;241:63-118. doi: 10.1007/164_2016_124.
A large problem of histamine receptor research is data heterogeneity. Various experimental approaches, the complex signaling pathways of mammalian cells, and the use of different species orthologues render it difficult to compare and interpret the published results. Thus, the four human histamine receptor subtypes were analyzed side-by-side in the Sf9 insect cell expression system, using radioligand binding assays as well as functional readouts proximal to the receptor activation event (steady-state GTPase assays and [S]GTPγS assays). The human HR was co-expressed with the regulators of G protein signaling RGS4 or GAIP, which unmasked a productive interaction between hHR and insect cell Gα. By contrast, functional expression of the hHR required the generation of an hHR-Gsα fusion protein to ensure close proximity of G protein and receptor. Fusion of hHR to the long (Gsα) or short (Gsα) splice variant of Gα resulted in comparable constitutive hHR activity, although both G protein variants show different GDP affinities. Medicinal chemistry studies revealed profound species differences between hHR/hHR and their guinea pig orthologues gpHR/gpHR. The causes for these differences were analyzed by molecular modeling in combination with mutational studies. Co-expression of the hHR with Gα, Gα, Gα, and Gα in Sf9 cells revealed high constitutive activity and comparable interaction efficiency with all G protein isoforms. A comparison of various cations (Li, Na, K) and anions (Cl, Br, I) revealed that anions with large radii most efficiently stabilize the inactive hHR state. Potential sodium binding sites in the hHR protein were analyzed by expressing specific hHR mutants in Sf9 cells. In contrast to the hHR, the hHR preferentially couples to co-expressed Gα in Sf9 cells. Its high constitutive activity is resistant to NaCl or GTPγS. The hHR shows structural instability and adopts a G protein-independent high-affinity state. A detailed characterization of affinity and activity of a series of hHR antagonists/inverse agonists allowed first conclusions about structure/activity relationships for inverse agonists at hHR. In summary, the Sf9 cell system permitted a successful side-by-side comparison of all four human histamine receptor subtypes. This chapter summarizes the results of pharmacological as well as medicinal chemistry/molecular modeling approaches and demonstrates that these data are not only important for a deeper understanding of HR pharmacology, but also have significant implications for the molecular pharmacology of GPCRs in general.
组胺受体研究中的一个大问题是数据异质性。各种实验方法、哺乳动物细胞复杂的信号通路以及不同物种直系同源物的使用,使得已发表结果的比较和解读变得困难。因此,在Sf9昆虫细胞表达系统中对四种人类组胺受体亚型进行了并列分析,采用放射性配体结合测定以及受体激活事件近端的功能读数(稳态GTP酶测定和[S]GTPγS测定)。人类组胺受体与G蛋白信号调节因子RGS4或GAIP共表达,这揭示了人类组胺受体与昆虫细胞Gα之间的有效相互作用。相比之下,人类组胺受体的功能性表达需要生成一种人类组胺受体-Gsα融合蛋白,以确保G蛋白和受体紧密靠近。将人类组胺受体与Gα的长(Gsα)或短(Gsα)剪接变体融合,导致了相当的组成型人类组胺受体活性,尽管这两种G蛋白变体显示出不同的GDP亲和力。药物化学研究揭示了人类组胺受体/人类组胺受体与其豚鼠直系同源物gpHR/gpHR之间的显著物种差异。通过分子建模结合突变研究分析了这些差异的原因。在Sf9细胞中将人类组胺受体与Gα、Gα、Gα和Gα共表达,揭示了高组成型活性以及与所有G蛋白亚型相当的相互作用效率。对各种阳离子(Li、Na、K)和阴离子(Cl、Br、I)的比较表明,半径较大的阴离子最有效地稳定了无活性的人类组胺受体状态。通过在Sf9细胞中表达特定的人类组胺受体突变体,分析了人类组胺受体蛋白中的潜在钠结合位点。与人类组胺受体不同,人类组胺受体在Sf9细胞中优先与共表达的Gα偶联。其高组成型活性对NaCl或GTPγS具有抗性。人类组胺受体表现出结构不稳定性,并呈现出一种不依赖G蛋白的高亲和力状态。对一系列人类组胺受体拮抗剂/反向激动剂的亲和力和活性进行详细表征,得出了关于人类组胺受体反向激动剂的结构/活性关系的初步结论。总之,Sf9细胞系统成功地对所有四种人类组胺受体亚型进行了并列比较。本章总结了药理学以及药物化学/分子建模方法的结果,并表明这些数据不仅对于更深入理解组胺受体药理学很重要,而且总体上对GPCRs的分子药理学也有重要意义。