Pontzer Herman
Department of Anthropology, Hunter College, City University of New York.
Evol Anthropol. 2017 Jan;26(1):12-24. doi: 10.1002/evan.21513.
Biological diversity is metabolic diversity: Differences in anatomy, physiology, life history, and activity reflect differences in energy allocation and expenditure among traits and tasks. Traditional frameworks in primatology, human ecology, public health, and paleoanthropology view daily energy expenditure as being more variable within than between species, changing with activity level but essentially fixed for a given body size. Growing evidence turns this view on its head. Total energy expenditure (kcal/d), varies relatively little within species, despite variation in physical activity; it varies considerably among species even after controlling for the effect of body size. Embracing this emerging paradigm requires rethinking potential trade-offs in energy allocation within and between species, assessing evidence of metabolic acceleration within lineages, and abandoning activity-based estimates of total energy expenditure. Difficult and exciting work lies ahead in the effort to untangle the ecological and evolutionary pressures shaping primate metabolic diversity.
解剖结构、生理机能、生活史和活动方面的差异反映了性状和任务之间能量分配与消耗的差异。灵长类动物学、人类生态学、公共卫生学和古人类学的传统框架认为,每日能量消耗在物种内部的变化比在物种之间的变化更大,会随着活动水平而改变,但对于给定的体型来说基本是固定的。越来越多的证据彻底颠覆了这一观点。尽管身体活动存在差异,但物种内部的总能量消耗(千卡/天)相对变化不大;即使在控制了体型的影响之后,物种之间的总能量消耗仍有很大差异。接受这一新兴范式需要重新思考物种内部和物种之间能量分配的潜在权衡,评估谱系内代谢加速的证据,并摒弃基于活动的总能量消耗估计方法。在努力理清塑造灵长类动物代谢多样性的生态和进化压力方面,艰巨而令人兴奋的工作还在前面。