Suppr超能文献

清醒经鼻气管插管在预计困难气道中的应用:LMA Fastrach 与纤维支气管镜:一项初步研究。

Awake tracheal intubation in anticipated difficult airways: LMA Fastrach vs flexible bronchoscope: A pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Loyola University Medical Center/Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology, Loyola University Medical Center/Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;37:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the use of LMA Fastrach intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) to flexible bronchoscopy (FB) for awake intubation in patients with difficult airways.

DESIGN

Randomized prospective study.

SETTING

Large academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Forty adult patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists I-IV, meeting the criteria for awake intubation based on history and physical examination.

INTERVENTIONS

After sedation and airway topicalization, patients were randomized to either FB group, n=19, or ILMA group, n=21. All intubations were performed by or under the supervision of an attending anesthesiologists, with variable participation of residents or certified registered nurse anesthetists. A maximum of three attempts were permitted with the assigned technique, to be followed by the alternative method in case of failure.

MEASUREMENTS

Times to carbon dioxide (end-tidal carbon dioxide) detection, endotracheal tube placement, number of attempts, training level of operator, and adverse events were recorded. Blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and heart rate were measured. Patients were interviewed the following day regarding their experience and satisfaction.

MAIN RESULTS

Overall intubation success rate within three attempts was 95% for both groups. However, successful intubation on the first attempt occurred at a significantly higher rate with ILMA vs FB (95% vs 58%; P=.0028). Total mean time to endotracheal tube placement was also significantly shorter in the ILMA group vs FB (92 vs 246 seconds; P=.0001). There were no adverse events in either group, and patient satisfaction was not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Awake intubation can be performed successfully and expeditiously with the use of LMA Fastrach in patients with a difficult airway and no contraindication to a blind technique. It compared favorably to the use of the fiberoptic bronchoscope in the patient cohort presented in this study.

摘要

研究目的

比较使用 LMA Fastrach 插管型喉罩气道(ILMA)与纤维支气管镜(FB)用于困难气道患者清醒插管的效果。

设计

随机前瞻性研究。

设置

大型学术医疗中心。

患者

40 名成年患者,美国麻醉医师协会 I-IV 级,根据病史和体格检查符合清醒插管标准。

干预

镇静和气道局部麻醉后,患者随机分为 FB 组(n=19)或 ILMA 组(n=21)。所有插管均由主治麻醉师或在其监督下进行,住院医师或注册护士麻醉师的参与程度不同。允许使用指定技术进行最多三次尝试,如果失败,则改用替代方法。

测量

记录二氧化碳(呼气末二氧化碳)检测、气管内导管放置、尝试次数、操作者的培训水平和不良事件。测量血压、血氧饱和度和心率。患者在次日接受访谈,了解他们的体验和满意度。

主要结果

两组的总体插管成功率在三次尝试内均为 95%。然而,ILMA 组首次尝试成功的比例明显高于 FB 组(95% vs 58%;P=.0028)。ILMA 组气管内导管放置的总平均时间也明显短于 FB 组(92 秒 vs 246 秒;P=.0001)。两组均无不良事件,患者满意度无显著差异。

结论

在没有盲探技术禁忌证的困难气道患者中,使用 LMA Fastrach 可成功且迅速地进行清醒插管,其效果优于纤维支气管镜。在本研究中纳入的患者队列中,它表现良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验