• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用二维与三维放射成像时肢体对线和股骨机械解剖角度的差异。

Differences in limb alignment and femoral mechanical-anatomical angles using two dimension versus three dimension radiographic imaging.

作者信息

Sailhan Frédéric, Jacob Louis, Hamadouche Moussa

机构信息

Hospital Cochin, Paris, France.

University of Paris 5, Paris, France.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2017 Oct;41(10):2009-2016. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3428-z. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00264-017-3428-z
PMID:28236072
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the femoral mechanical-anatomical (FMA) and mechanical femoro-tibial (MFT) angles in an osteoarthritic population using the 2D (two dimension) and the 3D (three dimension) EOS low-dose biplanar radiographic system (EOS).

METHODS

FMA and MFT angles were calculated in 127 adults with osteoarthritis. In 2D, FMA angle was measured between the femoral mechanical axis and the femoral anatomical axis, and MFT angle between the femoral mechanical axis and the tibial mechanical axis. In 3D, the measurement of FMA angle consisted of identifying specific anatomical landmarks on X-rays. MFT angle was then measured between the femoral mechanical axis and the tibial mechanical axis. The distribution of 2D and 3D values was assessed in terms of means and variances.

RESULTS

Mean age was 69 ± 12 years. A total of 10% of the patients having a 3D FMA angle between 4° and 7° have a 2D-measured FMA over or underestimated. Particularly, FMA values tend to be underestimated in women in 2D. Finally, we found that men showed a tendency to a more varus morphology, with MFT values being significantly underestimated in 2D.

CONCLUSIONS

The EOS 3D reconstruction system is a reliable method to measure FMA and MFT angles in an osteoarthritic population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用二维(2D)和三维(3D)EOS低剂量双平面放射成像系统(EOS),比较骨关节炎患者人群中的股骨机械解剖(FMA)角和股胫机械(MFT)角。

方法

对127例骨关节炎成年患者计算FMA角和MFT角。在二维中,FMA角在股骨机械轴与股骨解剖轴之间测量,MFT角在股骨机械轴与胫骨机械轴之间测量。在三维中,FMA角的测量包括在X射线上识别特定的解剖标志点。然后在股骨机械轴与胫骨机械轴之间测量MFT角。根据均值和方差评估二维和三维测量值的分布情况。

结果

平均年龄为69±12岁。三维FMA角在4°至7°之间的患者中,共有10%的患者二维测量的FMA角存在高估或低估情况。特别是,二维测量时女性的FMA值往往被低估。最后,我们发现男性呈现出更明显的内翻形态倾向,二维测量时MFT值被显著低估。

结论

EOS三维重建系统是测量骨关节炎患者人群中FMA角和MFT角的可靠方法。

相似文献

1
Differences in limb alignment and femoral mechanical-anatomical angles using two dimension versus three dimension radiographic imaging.使用二维与三维放射成像时肢体对线和股骨机械解剖角度的差异。
Int Orthop. 2017 Oct;41(10):2009-2016. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3428-z. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
2
Natural distribution of the femoral mechanical-anatomical angle in an osteoarthritic population and its relevance to total knee arthroplasty.骨关节炎人群中股骨机械解剖角的自然分布及其与全膝关节置换术的相关性。
Knee. 2012 Mar;19(2):120-3. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
3
Due to great variability fixed HKS angle for alignment of the distal cut leads to a significant error in coronal TKA orientation.由于固定 HKS 角对线的可变性很大,因此会导致在冠状面 TKA 方向上出现显著误差。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1434-1441. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5041-0. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
4
Highly variable coronal tibial and femoral alignment in osteoarthritic knees: a systematic review.骨关节炎膝关节中冠状胫骨和股骨对线的高度变化:系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1368-1377. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05506-2. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
5
Skeletal landmarks for TKR implantations: evaluation of their accuracy using EOS imaging acquisition system.膝关节置换植入物的骨骼标志:使用 EOS 成像采集系统评估其准确性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Feb;95(1):2-11. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2008.05.001. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
6
Phenotyping the knee in young non-osteoarthritic knees shows a wide distribution of femoral and tibial coronal alignment.在年轻非骨关节炎膝关节中对膝关节进行表型分析显示出股骨和胫骨冠状位排列的广泛分布。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1385-1393. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05508-0. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
7
Surgical epicondylar axis is not orthogonal to the femoral mechanical knee axis in valgus knees with primary osteoarthritis: Three-dimensional analysis according to knee coronal alignment in 112 patients.在患有原发性骨关节炎的外翻膝中,手术上的上髁轴与股骨机械性膝关节轴不正交:对112例患者根据膝关节冠状面排列进行的三维分析。
Knee. 2022 Dec;39:91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.08.011. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
8
Femoral mechanical-anatomical angle of osteoarthritic knees.骨关节炎膝关节的股骨机械解剖角
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Dec;97(12):1314-8.
9
A comparison of variable angle versus fixed angle distal femoral resection in primary total knee arthroplasty.在初次全膝关节置换术中,比较了可变角与固定角股骨远端截骨。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun;29(6):1133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
10
Two-dimensional planning can result in internal rotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty.在全膝关节置换术中,二维规划可能导致股骨组件内旋。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jan;24(1):229-35. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3370-1. Epub 2014 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence-guided assessment of the hip-knee-ankle angle shows excellent correlation with experienced human raters.人工智能引导下的髋-膝-踝角评估与经验丰富的人类评估者显示出极好的相关性。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Aug 27;12(3):e70383. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70383. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Patient-specific cutting guides increase accuracy of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy procedure: A retrospective case-control study.患者特异性截骨导板提高内侧开放楔形高位胫骨截骨术的准确性:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Mar 19;11(1):e12013. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.12013. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Fully automated assessment of the knee alignment on long leg radiographs following corrective knee osteotomies in patients with valgus or varus deformities.

本文引用的文献

1
Three dimensional radiological imaging of normal lower-limb alignment in children.儿童正常下肢对线的三维放射学成像
Int Orthop. 2015 Oct;39(10):2073-80. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2851-2. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
2
Offset and anteversion reconstruction after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty: an evaluation with the low-dose EOS system comparing two- and three-dimensional imaging.骨水泥型和非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术后的偏移和前倾角重建:使用低剂量EOS系统比较二维和三维成像的评估
Int Orthop. 2015 Jul;39(7):1259-67. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2616-3. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
3
New method for measuring acetabular component positioning with EOS imaging: feasibility study on dry bone.
在有膝内翻或膝外翻畸形的患者行膝关节矫正截骨术后的长腿正位 X 线片中,对膝关节对线进行全自动评估。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Mar;144(3):1029-1038. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05151-y. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
4
Knees with anteromedial osteoarthritis show a substantial phenotypic variation prior and following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.患有前内侧骨关节炎的膝关节在进行内侧单髁膝关节置换术前和术后表现出显著的表型差异。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5579-5590. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07603-9. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
5
Ethnical Differences in Knee Phenotypes Indicate the Need for a More Individualized Approach in Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison of 80 Asian Knees with 308 Caucasian Knees.膝关节表型的种族差异表明膝关节置换术需要更个性化的方法:80例亚洲膝关节与308例白种人膝关节的比较。
J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 17;12(1):121. doi: 10.3390/jpm12010121.
6
Influence of axial limb rotation on radiographic lower limb alignment: a systematic review.轴向肢体旋转对下肢放射学对线的影响:系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Nov;142(11):3349-3366. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04163-w. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
7
Double level knee osteotomy using patient-specific cutting guides is accurate and provides satisfactory clinical results: a prospective analysis of a cohort of twenty-two continuous patients.使用患者特异性截骨导板的双平面膝关节截骨术准确且提供满意的临床结果:连续 22 例患者队列的前瞻性分析。
Int Orthop. 2022 Mar;46(3):473-479. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05194-z. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
8
Anterior prominence of the femoral condyle varies among prosthesis designs and surgical techniques in total knee arthroplasty.在全膝关节置换术中,股骨髁前凸在假体设计和手术技术方面存在差异。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 12;22(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04670-2.
9
Distance from the magnification device contributes to differences in lower leg length measured in patients with TSF correction.距放大装置的距离导致 TSF 矫正患者下肢长度的测量值存在差异。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jul;142(7):1511-1522. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03831-1. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
10
Methods of intra- and post-operative determination of the position of the tibial component during total knee replacement.全膝关节置换术中及术后胫骨组件位置的确定方法。
Int Orthop. 2020 Jan;44(1):119-128. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04424-9. Epub 2019 Oct 27.
利用 EOS 成像测量髋臼部件定位的新方法:干骨的可行性研究。
Int Orthop. 2012 Nov;36(11):2205-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1650-2. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
4
Reliability of a new method for lower-extremity measurements based on stereoradiographic three-dimensional reconstruction.基于体层摄影三维重建的下肢测量新方法的可靠性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Sep;98(5):506-13. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.03.014. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
5
Evaluation of a new low-dose biplanar system to assess lower-limb alignment in 3D: a phantom study.评估一种新的低剂量双平面系统以三维评估下肢对线:一项体模研究。
Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Sep;41(10):1287-93. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1438-x. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
6
The EOS™ imaging system and its uses in daily orthopaedic practice.EOS 成像系统及其在日常骨科实践中的应用。
Int Orthop. 2012 Jul;36(7):1325-31. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1512-y. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
7
Geometrical values of the normal and arthritic hip and knee detected with the EOS imaging system.EOS 成像系统检测到的正常髋关节和膝关节与关节炎髋关节和膝关节的几何值。
Int Orthop. 2012 Jun;36(6):1291-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1403-7. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
8
Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: opposes.中立位机械对线:全膝关节置换成功的一项要求:反对意见。 (感觉原英文表述有点奇怪,这样翻译可能不完全符合其确切含义,建议检查下原文是否准确)
Orthopedics. 2011 Sep 9;34(9):e507-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110714-41.
9
Natural distribution of the femoral mechanical-anatomical angle in an osteoarthritic population and its relevance to total knee arthroplasty.骨关节炎人群中股骨机械解剖角的自然分布及其与全膝关节置换术的相关性。
Knee. 2012 Mar;19(2):120-3. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
10
Fast 3D reconstruction of the lower limb using a parametric model and statistical inferences and clinical measurements calculation from biplanar X-rays.使用参数模型和统计推断以及双平面X射线进行下肢的快速3D重建和临床测量计算。
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2012;15(5):457-66. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2010.540758. Epub 2011 May 24.