Merlin Aurélie, Chauvin Alain, Lehebel Anne, Brisseau Nadine, Froger Sébastien, Bareille Nathalie, Chartier Christophe
BIOEPAR, INRA, Oniris, La Chantrerie, 44307, Nantes, France.
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Mar 1;138:104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
A two-year study was carried out to assess the feasibility of a targeted selective treatment to control gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) in 24 groups of first grazing season (FGS) cattle. A two-step procedure aiming at defining exposure risk at group level and at identifying the most infected individuals within groups through measurement of the average daily weight gain (ADWG) at housing was used. The first step was to define retrospectively, by grazing management practices (GMP) indicators, two levels of groups' exposure to GIN determined by anti O. ostertagi antibody ODR level (cut-off 0.7). For the low level of exposure, no relationship between parasitological parameters and heifer growth was seen, whereas for the high level ADWG was negatively correlated with increasing Ostertagia ODR values. The best classification was obtained with an expert system modelling the number of Ostertagia L3 generations on plots. GMP input for the expert system included standard data (turnout/housing data and supplementary feeding amount) combined with paddock rotation planning and monthly temperatures. The threshold of 3 successive generations of L3 or more on plots allowed identifying the groups according to low or high infection exposure level, except two groups that were misidentified as being highly exposed. In the second step, individual ADWG was found to be negatively associated with Ostertagia ODR in heifers from groups classified as highly exposed (≥3 generations of L3). In these groups, sensitivity and specificity of ADWG thresholds were calculated for several individual Ostertagia ODR thresholds. The best compromise between sensitivity (i.e., correctly treating the heifers that need to be treated) and specificity (i.e., not treating animals that should not be treated) was equivalent respectively to 76% and 56% (AUC≈0.7) and was reached using an end-season ADWG threshold of 683g/day to detect animals exhibiting an Ostertagia ODR cut-off at 0.93. Other ADWG thresholds were proposed taking into account the farmers' or the veterinarians' objectives: either maximizing the production through both an increase of the ADWG threshold and the sensitivity or keeping a significant nematode population in refugia with a corresponding limitation of anthelmintic treatments through a decrease of ADWG threshold and an increase of the specificity. Finally, a targeted selective treatment for FGS cattle based on GMP and flexible ADWG thresholds seems feasible at housing without laboratory analysis, accepting that some resilient animals with high Ostertagia ODR will not be treated due to their ability to perform under parasitic challenge.
开展了一项为期两年的研究,以评估针对24组首个放牧季节(FGS)牛群控制胃肠道线虫(GIN)的靶向选择性治疗的可行性。采用了两步程序,旨在通过测量入栏时的平均日增重(ADWG)来确定群体层面的暴露风险,并识别群体中感染最严重的个体。第一步是通过放牧管理实践(GMP)指标进行回顾性定义,根据抗奥斯特他线虫抗体ODR水平(临界值0.7)确定两组不同的GIN暴露水平。对于低暴露水平,未观察到寄生虫学参数与小母牛生长之间的关系,而对于高暴露水平,ADWG与奥斯特他线虫ODR值的增加呈负相关。通过对地块上奥斯特他线虫L3世代数量进行建模的专家系统获得了最佳分类。专家系统的GMP输入包括标准数据(放牧/入栏数据和补充饲料量),并结合牧场轮作规划和月温度。地块上连续出现3代或更多代L3的阈值能够根据低感染暴露水平或高感染暴露水平识别牛群,但有两组被误判为高暴露。在第二步中,发现入栏时被归类为高暴露(≥3代L3)群体中的小母牛个体ADWG与奥斯特他线虫ODR呈负相关。在这些群体中,针对几个个体奥斯特他线虫ODR阈值计算了ADWG阈值的敏感性和特异性。敏感性(即正确治疗需要治疗的小母牛)和特异性(即不治疗不应治疗的动物)之间的最佳折衷分别为76%和56%(AUC≈0.7),通过使用683克/天的季末ADWG阈值来检测奥斯特他线虫ODR临界值为0.93的动物得以实现。考虑到农民或兽医的目标,还提出了其他ADWG阈值:要么通过提高ADWG阈值和敏感性来最大化产量,要么通过降低ADWG阈值和提高特异性来在避难所中保留大量线虫种群,并相应限制驱虫治疗。最后,基于GMP和灵活的ADWG阈值对FGS牛进行靶向选择性治疗,在入栏时无需实验室分析似乎是可行的,但要接受一些奥斯特他线虫ODR值高但具有抵抗力的动物由于其在寄生虫挑战下的表现能力而不进行治疗的情况。