Ling Jiying, Robbins Lorraine B, Wen Fujun, Zhang Nanhua
Michigan State University College of Nursing, East Lansing, Michigan.
Michigan State University College of Nursing, East Lansing, Michigan.
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jul;53(1):102-112. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
With healthy behaviors becoming established in the preschool years, intervening with preschool children to assist them in establishing a healthy lifestyle and maintaining a long-term healthy weight is critical. To optimize future intervention designs, this meta-analysis aimed to estimate the effects of lifestyle interventions on BMI among preschool children and explore potential intervention moderators.
In October 2015, a search of PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Cochrane library databases yielded 52 eligible articles with 42 randomized intervention-control comparisons (31 prevention and 11 treatment). In 2016, weighted standardized mean differences for BMI were calculated using random-effects models to estimate effect sizes.
The effect sizes were -0.19 (95% CI=-0.28, -0.09) and -0.28 (95% CI=-0.48, -0.09) kg/m for prevention and treatment interventions, with sustained effect sizes of -0.21 (95% CI=-0.35, -0.08) and -0.23 (95% CI=-0.43, -0.04) kg/m, respectively. Child mean age, percentage Hispanic, and parental intervention sessions were common significant moderators. School-based or prevention interventions with active parental involvement did not yield better outcomes. Interventions targeting parents with parenting skill training and behavioral change strategies, and children with general health and nutrition education, resulted in greater effects.
Although publication bias limits the validity of the study findings, the meta-analysis results highlight the promising intervention approaches of parenting skill training and behavioral change strategies to target parents. However, for children, general health and nutrition education should be employed.
随着健康行为在学龄前阶段得以确立,对学龄前儿童进行干预,帮助他们建立健康的生活方式并长期保持健康体重至关重要。为优化未来的干预设计,本荟萃分析旨在评估生活方式干预对学龄前儿童体重指数(BMI)的影响,并探索潜在的干预调节因素。
2015年10月,检索了PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE、PsycINFO、ERIC和Cochrane图书馆数据库,获得了52篇符合条件的文章,其中有42项随机干预对照比较(31项预防和11项治疗)。2016年,使用随机效应模型计算BMI的加权标准化均数差,以估计效应大小。
预防和治疗干预的效应大小分别为-0.19(95%CI=-0.28,-0.09)和-0.28(95%CI=-0.48,-0.09)kg/m²,持续效应大小分别为-0.21(95%CI=-0.35,-0.08)和-0.23(95%CI=-0.43,-0.04)kg/m²。儿童平均年龄、西班牙裔百分比和家长干预次数是常见的显著调节因素。有家长积极参与的基于学校的或预防干预并未产生更好的结果。针对家长进行育儿技能培训和行为改变策略,以及针对儿童进行一般健康和营养教育的干预,效果更佳。
尽管发表偏倚限制了研究结果的有效性,但荟萃分析结果突出了针对家长的育儿技能培训和行为改变策略这一有前景的干预方法。然而,对于儿童,应采用一般健康和营养教育。