Suppr超能文献

花生过敏原阈值研究(PATS):一项新的单剂量口服食物挑战研究,旨在验证花生过敏儿童的激发剂量。

Peanut Allergen Threshold Study (PATS): Novel single-dose oral food challenge study to validate eliciting doses in children with peanut allergy.

机构信息

Paediatrics and Child Health, University College, Cork, Ireland.

Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 May;139(5):1583-1590. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.030. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eliciting doses (EDs) of allergenic foods can be defined by the distribution of threshold doses for subjects within a specific population. The ED is the dose that elicits a reaction in 5% of allergic subjects. The predicted ED for peanut is 1.5 mg of peanut protein (6 mg of whole peanut).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to validate the predicted peanut ED (1.5 mg) with a novel single-dose challenge.

METHODS

Consecutive eligible children with peanut allergy in 3 centers were prospectively invited to participate, irrespective of previous reaction severity. Predetermined criteria for objective reactions were used to identify ED single-dose reactors.

RESULTS

Five hundred eighteen children (mean age, 6.8 years) were eligible. No significant demographic or clinical differences were identified between 381 (74%) participants and 137 (26%) nonparticipants or between subjects recruited at each center. Three hundred seventy-eight children (206 male) completed the study. Almost half the group reported ignoring precautionary allergen labeling. Two hundred forty-five (65%) children experienced no reaction to the single dose of peanut. Sixty-seven (18%) children reported a subjective reaction without objective findings. Fifty-eight (15%) children experienced signs of a mild and transient nature that did not meet the predetermined criteria. Only 8 (2.1%; 95% CI, 0.6%-3.4%) subjects met the predetermined criteria for an objective and likely related event. No child experienced more than a mild reaction, 4 of the 8 received oral antihistamines only, and none received epinephrine. Food allergy-related quality of life improved from baseline to 1 month after challenge regardless of outcome (η = 0.2, P < .0001). Peanut skin prick test responses and peanut- and Ara h 2-specific IgE levels were not associated with objective reactivity to peanut ED.

CONCLUSION

A single administration of 1.5 mg of peanut protein elicited objective reactions in fewer than the predicted 5% of patients with peanut allergy. The novel single-dose oral food challenge appears clinically safe and patient acceptable, regardless of the outcome. It identifies the most highly dose-sensitive population with food allergy not otherwise identifiable by using routinely available peanut skin prick test responses or specific IgE levels, but this single-dose approach has not yet been validated for risk assessment of individual patients.

摘要

背景

过敏原食物的激发剂量(ED)可以通过特定人群中阈值剂量的分布来定义。ED 是引起 5%过敏受试者反应的剂量。预测花生的 ED 为 1.5 毫克花生蛋白(6 毫克整粒花生)。

目的

我们旨在通过新的单次剂量挑战来验证预测的花生 ED(1.5 毫克)。

方法

在三个中心,连续邀请符合条件的花生过敏儿童前瞻性参与,无论以前的反应严重程度如何。使用客观反应的预定标准来识别 ED 单剂量反应者。

结果

518 名儿童(平均年龄 6.8 岁)符合条件。在 381 名(74%)参与者和 137 名(26%)非参与者之间,以及在每个中心招募的受试者之间,没有发现显著的人口统计学或临床差异。378 名儿童(206 名男性)完成了研究。近一半的组报告忽略了预防性过敏原标签。245 名(65%)儿童对单剂量花生无反应。67 名(18%)儿童报告有主观反应但无客观发现。58 名(15%)儿童出现轻微且短暂的症状,但不符合预定标准。只有 8 名(2.1%;95%CI,0.6%-3.4%)受试者符合预定标准,出现客观且可能相关的事件。没有儿童出现更严重的反应,8 名儿童中有 4 名仅接受了口服抗组胺药治疗,没有儿童接受肾上腺素治疗。无论结果如何,食物过敏相关生活质量在挑战后 1 个月均从基线改善(η=0.2,P<.0001)。花生皮试反应和花生及 Ara h 2 特异性 IgE 水平与花生 ED 的客观反应无关。

结论

单次给予 1.5 毫克花生蛋白引起的客观反应少于预测的 5%花生过敏患者。新的单次口服食物挑战在临床和患者可接受方面均安全,无论结果如何。它可以识别出对常规使用的花生皮试反应或特异性 IgE 水平无法识别的食物过敏中最敏感的人群,但这种单次剂量方法尚未针对个体患者的风险评估进行验证。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验