Suppr超能文献

凝血因子 VIII 抑制物旁路活性制剂(FEIBA)和新鲜冰冻血浆用于口服抗凝剂相关颅内出血的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性分析

Safety and Effectiveness of Factor VIII Inhibitor Bypassing Activity (FEIBA) and Fresh Frozen Plasma in Oral Anticoagulant-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Analysis.

作者信息

Yin Ellen B, Tan Benedict, Nguyen Thuy, Salazar Miguel, Putney Kimberly, Gupta Pramod, Suarez Jose I, Bershad Eric M

机构信息

CHI St. Luke's Health - Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2017 Aug;27(1):51-59. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0383-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral anticoagulant (OAT)-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a life-threatening emergency for which prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) are considered first-line reversal agents. The only approved PCC in the USA for warfarin-associated ICH is non-activated PCC. Little data are available regarding the safety and effectiveness of factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) which is an activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC). The aim of this analysis was to assess the safety and effectiveness of FEIBA compared to fresh frozen plasma (FFP) for reversal of OAT-associated ICH.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected to compare coagulation markers and in-hospital clinical outcomes in patients who received aPCC with or without FFP versus FFP alone for the reversal of OAT-associated ICH.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients met inclusion criteria; 50 patients received FFP alone, and 34 patients received FEIBA (mean dose 20 U/kg) with or without FFP for OAT-associated ICH. The proportion of diagnosed thrombotic events during hospitalization was similar in both groups (8% in the FFP group vs. 12% in the FEIBA group; P = 0.56). Median time to INR < 1.5 was achieved faster in the FEIBA group versus the FFP group (0.5 h [IQR 0.5-1.] vs. 10 h [IQR 5-16.3], respectively; P < 0.001) reflecting a trend toward shorter median time to neurosurgical intervention. Hematoma expansion, length of stay, and all-cause mortality were similar between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of FEIBA does not appear to increase the risk of thrombotic events compared with FFP. FEIBA administration resulted in faster INR reversal with a trend toward shorter time to neurosurgical intervention. However, there was no difference in hematoma expansion, mortality or length of stay.

摘要

背景

口服抗凝剂(OAT)相关的颅内出血(ICH)是一种危及生命的紧急情况,对此凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(PCC)被视为一线逆转剂。在美国,唯一获批用于华法林相关ICH的PCC是非活化PCC。关于活化凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(aPCC)即凝血因子VIII抑制剂旁路活性制剂(FEIBA)的安全性和有效性的数据很少。本分析的目的是评估与新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)相比,FEIBA用于逆转OAT相关ICH的安全性和有效性。

方法

回顾性收集数据,以比较接受aPCC(伴或不伴FFP)与单独接受FFP用于逆转OAT相关ICH的患者的凝血指标和住院临床结局。

结果

84例患者符合纳入标准;50例患者单独接受FFP,34例患者接受FEIBA(平均剂量20 U/kg)用于OAT相关ICH,伴或不伴FFP。两组住院期间确诊血栓事件的比例相似(FFP组为8%,FEIBA组为12%;P = 0.56)。FEIBA组达到国际标准化比值(INR)< 1.5的中位时间比FFP组更快(分别为0.5小时[四分位间距0.5 - 1.0]和10小时[四分位间距5 - 16.3];P < 0.001),这反映出神经外科干预的中位时间有缩短趋势。两组间血肿扩大、住院时间和全因死亡率相似。

结论

与FFP相比,给予FEIBA似乎不会增加血栓事件风险。给予FEIBA可更快逆转INR,且有神经外科干预时间缩短的趋势。然而,在血肿扩大、死亡率或住院时间方面没有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验