Department of Medicine and Biological Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma.
Hidaka Hospital, Takasaki, Gunma.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 May;30(5):444-453.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a predictor of adverse outcomes in hemodialysis patients. LVEF is, however, an integral parameter determined by contractility, loading condition, and coupling. We sought to determine whether these components would better predict adverse outcomes and have incremental prognostic value over a validated clinical score and EF.
Two hundred thirty-four hemodialysis patients were prospectively followed up for primary composite endpoint: all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and hospitalization due to worsening heart failure (HF). Load-independent contractility (end-systolic elastance [Ees] and preload recruitable stroke work [PRSW]) and arterial afterload (arterial elastance [Ea]) were noninvasively estimated. Ventricular-arterial coupling was assessed using the Ea/Ees ratio. LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) and mitral E-wave over annular velocity E' ratio (E/E') were also measured.
During a median follow-up of 776 days, 30 patients developed the primary endpoint. Ees, PRSW, GLS, S', Ea/Ees, E/E', and EF were independently associated with the outcome after adjusting for the clinical score and prior HF hospitalization, whereas end-diastolic volume index or arterial afterload parameters were not. The nested Cox models indicated that Ea/Ees had independent and incremental predictive value over the model based on the score and either EF or E/E'. Furthermore, Ea/Ees continued to have predictive value after adjusting for GLS. The classification and regression analysis stratified event rates ranging from 4.2% to 68.8%.
LV contractility and Ea/Ees were independently associated with adverse outcome in hemodialysis patients. Ea/Ees had an incremental prognostic value over the clinical score and EF.
左心室射血分数(LVEF)是血液透析患者不良预后的预测指标。然而,LVEF 是一个综合参数,由收缩性、负荷条件和偶联决定。我们试图确定这些因素是否能更好地预测不良预后,并比经过验证的临床评分和 EF 具有更大的预后价值。
前瞻性随访 234 例血液透析患者,主要复合终点为全因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和因心力衰竭恶化而住院。非依赖性收缩性(收缩末期弹性[Ees]和预负荷可激发的做功[PRSW])和动脉后负荷(动脉弹性[Ea])通过无创方法进行估计。使用 Ea/Ees 比值评估心室-动脉偶联。还测量了左心室整体纵向应变(GLS)和二尖瓣环速度 E 波与 E'波的比值(E/E')。
在中位随访 776 天期间,30 例患者发生了主要终点。在调整临床评分和既往心力衰竭住院后,Ees、PRSW、GLS、S'、Ea/Ees、E/E'和 EF 与结局独立相关,而舒张末期容积指数或动脉后负荷参数则不相关。嵌套 Cox 模型表明,Ea/Ees 在基于评分的模型和 EF 或 E/E'的基础上具有独立且增量的预测价值。此外,Ea/Ees 在调整 GLS 后仍具有预测价值。分类和回归分析将事件发生率分层为 4.2%至 68.8%。
LV 收缩性和 Ea/Ees 与血液透析患者的不良预后独立相关。Ea/Ees 比临床评分和 EF 具有更大的预后价值。