Suppr超能文献

分析在使用按需药物之前尝试的非药物干预措施。

Analysis of non-pharmacological interventions attempted prior to pro re nata medication use.

机构信息

Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, Whitby, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(1):296-302. doi: 10.1111/inm.12320. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to elucidate what non-pharmacological interventions are applied by nursing staff prior to the administration of psychotropic pro re nata (PRN) medication. Best practices would instruct clinical staff to provide non-pharmacological strategies, such as de-escalation and skills coaching, as the first response to patient distress, anxiety, or agitation. Non-pharmacological strategies might be safer for patients, promote more collaborative relationships, and facilitate greater skills development for managing symptoms. The literature has highlighted that poor documentation of pre-PRN administration interventions has limited our understanding of this practice, but evidence suggests that when this information is available, non-pharmaceutical approaches are not being attempted in the majority of cases. This is troubling given that, while clinically appropriate in some instances, PRN have been subject to criticism and lack critical evidence to support their use. The current study is a continuation of our previous work, which examined the reason, frequency, documentation, and outcome (e.g. effectiveness, side-effects) of PRN medication use at our facility. A chart review was conducted to understand what happens prior to the administration of PRN medication at our facility across all inpatient units over the course of 3 months. Results support previous findings that non-pharmacological interventions are poorly documented by front-line staff and are seemingly used infrequently. The use of these interventions differs by patient presentation (e.g. agitation, insomnia), and most often include supportive measures. The findings suggest that both documentation and intervention practices of nursing staff require further investigation and adjustment to align with best practices.

摘要

本研究旨在阐明护理人员在开具精神科按需处方(PRN)前应用了哪些非药物干预措施。最佳实践将指导临床工作人员在患者出现不适、焦虑或激动时,首先采用非药物策略,如缓和紧张情绪和技能培训。对于患者来说,非药物策略可能更安全,能促进更具协作性的关系,并有助于更熟练地管理症状。文献强调,对 PRN 给药前干预措施的记录不佳限制了我们对此实践的理解,但有证据表明,在大多数情况下,并未尝试非药物方法。鉴于在某些情况下,PRN 虽然在临床上是合适的,但它们受到批评且缺乏支持其使用的关键证据,这种情况令人担忧。本研究是我们之前工作的延续,之前的研究检查了我们机构在 3 个月内所有住院病房 PRN 药物使用的原因、频率、记录和结果(例如效果、副作用)。进行了图表审查,以了解我们机构在开具 PRN 药物前在所有住院病房发生了什么。结果支持先前的发现,即一线工作人员对非药物干预措施记录不佳,且似乎很少使用。这些干预措施的使用因患者的表现(如激动、失眠)而异,最常包括支持性措施。研究结果表明,护理人员的记录和干预措施都需要进一步调查和调整,以符合最佳实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验