Onwochei Desire N, Ngan Kee Warwick D, Fung Lillia, Downey Kristi, Ye Xiang Y, Carvalho Jose C A
From the *Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada; †Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong; and ‡Maternal-Infant Care Research Centre (MiCare), Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada.
Anesth Analg. 2017 Jul;125(1):212-218. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001846.
The use of phenylephrine as the first-line agent for prevention and treatment of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery (CD) may reduce cardiac output, posing a theoretical risk to mother and fetus. Norepinephrine has been suggested as a potential alternative, because its β-adrenergic effects might result in greater heart rate and cardiac output than phenylephrine. The use of norepinephrine to prevent and treat hypotension during CD is new, and its use as a bolus has not been fully determined in this context. The purpose of this study was to determine the effective norepinephrine dose, when given as intermittent intravenous (IV) boluses, to prevent postspinal hypotension in 90% of women undergoing elective CD (ED90).
This was a prospective, double-blind sequential allocation dose-finding study, using the biased coin up-and-down design. Forty-term pregnant women undergoing elective CD under spinal anesthesia received a set intermittent norepinephrine bolus of either 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 µg every time their systolic blood pressure (SBP) fell to below 100% of baseline. The primary outcome was the success of the norepinephrine regimen to maintain SBP at or above 80% of baseline, from induction of spinal anesthesia to delivery of the fetus. Secondary outcomes included nausea, vomiting, hypertension (SBP > 120% of baseline), bradycardia (<50 bpm), upper sensory level of anesthesia to ice cold and umbilical artery and vein blood gases. The ED90 and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using both truncated Dixon and Mood and isotonic regression methods.
The estimated ED90 of norepinephrine was 5.49 µg (95% CI, 5.15-5.83) using the truncated Dixon and Mood method and 5.80 µg (95% CI, 5.01-6.59) using the isotonic regression method.
The use of intermittent IV norepinephrine boluses to prevent spinal-induced hypotension in elective CD seems feasible and was not observed to be associated with adverse outcomes. Practically, we suggest an ED90 dose of 6 µg. Further work is warranted to elucidate the comparative effects of intermittent IV bolus doses of phenylephrine and norepinephrine, in terms of efficacy and safety.
在剖宫产(CD)期间,使用去氧肾上腺素作为预防和治疗产妇低血压的一线药物可能会降低心输出量,对母亲和胎儿构成理论风险。去甲肾上腺素被认为是一种潜在的替代药物,因为其β-肾上腺素能效应可能导致比去氧肾上腺素更高的心率和心输出量。在剖宫产期间使用去甲肾上腺素预防和治疗低血压是新的做法,在此背景下其作为推注药物的使用尚未完全确定。本研究的目的是确定以间歇性静脉推注方式给予去甲肾上腺素时,能使90%接受择期剖宫产的女性(ED90)预防脊麻后低血压的有效剂量。
这是一项前瞻性、双盲序贯分配剂量探索研究,采用偏倚硬币上下设计。40名在脊麻下接受择期剖宫产的足月孕妇,每次收缩压(SBP)降至基线的100%以下时,接受3、4、5、6、7或8μg的一组间歇性去甲肾上腺素推注。主要结局是从脊麻诱导到胎儿娩出期间,去甲肾上腺素方案成功将SBP维持在基线的80%或以上。次要结局包括恶心、呕吐、高血压(SBP>基线的120%)、心动过缓(<50次/分钟)、对冰冷的麻醉上感觉平面以及脐动脉和静脉血气。使用截断的狄克逊和穆德方法以及等渗回归方法估计ED90和95%置信区间(CI)。
使用截断的狄克逊和穆德方法,去甲肾上腺素的估计ED90为5.49μg(95%CI,5.15 - 5.83);使用等渗回归方法,为5.80μg(95%CI,5.01 - 6.59)。
在择期剖宫产中使用间歇性静脉推注去甲肾上腺素预防脊麻引起的低血压似乎是可行的,且未观察到与不良结局相关。实际上,我们建议ED90剂量为6μg。有必要进一步开展工作,以阐明间歇性静脉推注剂量的去氧肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素在疗效和安全性方面的比较效果。