Suppr超能文献

接受机械通气的急性肺炎性呼吸衰竭患者对高频胸壁振荡的即时反应:一项随机对照研究。

Instantaneous responses to high-frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with acute pneumonic respiratory failure receiving mechanical ventilation: A randomized controlled study.

作者信息

Chuang Ming-Lung, Chou Yi-Ling, Lee Chai-Yuan, Huang Shih-Feng

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary Medicine Department of Critical Care Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital School of Medicine Department of Nursing, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan 40201, ROC.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(9):e5912. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005912.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endotracheal intubation and prolonged immobilization of patients receiving mechanical ventilation may reduce expectoration function. High-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) may ameliorate airway secretion movement; however, the instantaneous changes in patients' cardiopulmonary responses are unknown. Moreover, HFCWO may influence ventilator settings by the vigorous oscillation. The aim of this study was to investigate these issues.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients (52 men) aged 71.5 ± 13.4 years who were intubated with mechanical ventilation for pneumonic respiratory failure were recruited and randomly classified into 2 groups (HFCWO group, n = 36; and control group who received conventional chest physical therapy (CCPT, n = 37). HFCWO was applied with a fixed protocol, whereas CCPT was conducted using standard protocols. Both groups received sputum suction after the procedure. Changes in ventilator settings and the subjects' responses were measured at preset intervals and compared within groups and between groups.

RESULTS

Oscillation did not affect the ventilator settings (all P > 0.05). The mean airway pressure, breathing frequency, and rapid shallow breathing index increased, and the tidal volume and SpO2 decreased (all P < 0.05). After sputum suction, the peak airway pressure (Ppeak) and minute ventilation decreased (all P < 0.05). The HFCWO group had a lower tidal volume and SpO2 at the end of oscillation, and lower Ppeak and tidal volume after sputum suction than the CCPT group.

CONCLUSIONS

HFCWO affects breathing pattern and SpO2 but not ventilator settings, whereas CCPT maintains a steadier condition. After sputum suction, HFCWO slightly improved Ppeak compared to CCPT, suggesting that the study extends the indications of HFCWO for these patients in intensive care unit. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02758106, retrospectively registered.).

摘要

背景

气管插管以及接受机械通气患者的长期制动可能会降低排痰功能。高频胸壁振荡(HFCWO)可能会改善气道分泌物移动;然而,患者心肺反应的即时变化尚不清楚。此外,HFCWO可能会因剧烈振荡而影响呼吸机设置。本研究的目的是调查这些问题。

方法

招募73例年龄为71.5±13.4岁、因肺炎性呼吸衰竭接受机械通气插管的患者(52例男性),并随机分为两组(HFCWO组,n = 36;接受传统胸部物理治疗的对照组,n = 37)。HFCWO按照固定方案应用,而CCPT则使用标准方案进行。两组在操作后均进行吸痰。在预设时间间隔测量呼吸机设置和受试者反应的变化,并在组内和组间进行比较。

结果

振荡未影响呼吸机设置(所有P>0.05)。平均气道压力、呼吸频率和快速浅呼吸指数升高,潮气量和SpO2降低(所有P<0.05)。吸痰后,气道峰压(Ppeak)和分钟通气量降低(所有P<0.05)。HFCWO组在振荡结束时潮气量和SpO2较低,吸痰后Ppeak和潮气量低于CCPT组。

结论

HFCWO影响呼吸模式和SpO2,但不影响呼吸机设置,而CCPT能维持更稳定的状态。吸痰后,与CCPT相比,HFCWO使Ppeak略有改善,表明本研究扩展了HFCWO在重症监护病房这些患者中的应用指征。(ClinicalTrials.gov编号NCT02758106,回顾性注册。)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acdc/5340427/f815a4b36480/medi-96-e5912-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验