Borgbjerg Jens, Madsen Frank, Odgaard Anders
Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus Universty Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
J Knee Surg. 2017 Oct;30(8):829-834. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598174. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether patients can accurately self-assess their knee passive range of motion (PROM). A picture-based questionnaire for patient self-assessment of knee PROM was developed and posted to patients. The self-assessed PROM from 58 patients was compared with surgeon-assessed PROM using a short-arm goniometer. Agreement between the measurement methods was calculated with the Bland-Altman method. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of patient-assessed PROM in dichotomously detecting knee motion impairment in both flexion (≤ 100 degrees) and extension (≥ 10-degree flexion contracture). Surgeon- and patient-assessed knee PROM showed a mean difference (95% limits of agreement) of -2.1 degrees (-42.5 to 38.3 degrees) for flexion and -8.1 degrees (-28.8 to 12.7 degrees) for extension. The sensitivity of patient self-assessed PROM in identifying knee flexion and extension impairments was 86 and 100%, respectively, whereas its specificity was 84 and 43%, respectively. Although wide limits of agreement were observed between surgeon- and patient-assessed knee PROM, the picture-based questionnaire for patient assessment of knee ROM was found to be a valid tool for dichotomously detecting knee motion impairment in flexion (≤ 100 degrees). However, the specificity of the questionnaire for detection of knee extension impairments (≥ 10-degree flexion contracture) was low, which limits is practical utility for this purpose.
本研究的目的是调查患者是否能够准确地自我评估其膝关节被动活动范围(PROM)。我们开发了一种基于图片的用于患者自我评估膝关节PROM的问卷,并将其分发给患者。使用短臂测角仪将58例患者自我评估的PROM与外科医生评估的PROM进行比较。采用Bland-Altman方法计算测量方法之间的一致性。我们计算了患者评估的PROM在二分法检测膝关节屈曲(≤100度)和伸展(≥10度屈曲挛缩)运动障碍方面的敏感性和特异性。外科医生和患者评估的膝关节PROM在屈曲方面的平均差异(一致性界限的95%)为-2.1度(-42.5至38.3度),在伸展方面为-8.1度(-28.8至12.7度)。患者自我评估的PROM在识别膝关节屈曲和伸展障碍方面的敏感性分别为86%和100%,而其特异性分别为84%和43%。尽管外科医生和患者评估的膝关节PROM之间观察到较宽的一致性界限,但发现基于图片的用于患者评估膝关节ROM的问卷是二分法检测膝关节屈曲(≤100度)运动障碍的有效工具。然而,该问卷检测膝关节伸展障碍(≥10度屈曲挛缩)的特异性较低,这限制了其在此方面的实际应用。