Lajhar Salma A, Brownlie Jeremy, Barlow Robert
School of Natural Sciences, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
BMC Microbiol. 2017 Mar 1;17(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-0963-0.
After E. coli O157, E. coli O26 is the second most prevalent enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) serotype identified in cases of foodborne illness in Australia and throughout the world. E. coli O26 associated foodborne outbreaks have drawn attention to the survival capabilities of this organism in a range of environments. The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of E. coli O26 to survive the effects of disinfectants, acids and antimicrobials and investigate the possible influence of virulence genes in survival and persistence of E. coli O26 from human and cattle sources from Australia.
Initial characterization indicated that E. coli O26 are a genetically diverse group that were shown to belong to a number of pathotypes. Overall, 86.4% of isolates were susceptible to all antimicrobials tested with no significant differences in resistance observed between pathotypes. A representative subset of isolates (n = 40) were selected to determine their ability to survive disinfectants at proposed industry working concentrations and acid stress. Profoam, Kwiksan 22, and Topactive DES. were able to inhibit the growth of 100% of isolates. The remaining three disinfectants (Dairy Chlor 12.5%, Envirosan and Maxifoam) were not effective against the subset of 40 E. coli O26. Finally, elevated MICs (1,024 to 4,096 μg/ml) of acetic, propionic, lactic, and citric acids were determined for the majority of the isolates (85%).
Australian E. coli O26 isolates belong to a range of pathotypes that harbor differing virulence markers. Despite this, their response to antimicrobials, disinfectants and acids is similar confirming that stress response appears unrelated to the presence of EHEC virulence markers. Notwithstanding, the tolerance to disinfectants and the elevated acid MICs for EHEC and the other E. coli O26 pathotypes examined in this study may contribute to bacterial colonization on food contact surfaces and subsequent foodborne illness caused by this pathogen.
在大肠杆菌O157之后,大肠杆菌O26是在澳大利亚和全球食源性疾病病例中鉴定出的第二常见的肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)血清型。与大肠杆菌O26相关的食源性疾病暴发引起了人们对该菌在一系列环境中生存能力的关注。本研究的目的是评估大肠杆菌O26在消毒剂、酸和抗菌剂作用下的存活能力,并研究毒力基因对来自澳大利亚人和牛源的大肠杆菌O26存活和持续存在的可能影响。
初步鉴定表明,大肠杆菌O26是一个基因多样的群体,属于多种致病型。总体而言,86.4%的分离株对所有测试抗菌剂敏感,各致病型之间在耐药性上未观察到显著差异。选择一组代表性分离株(n = 40)来确定它们在建议的工业工作浓度下对消毒剂和酸应激的存活能力。Profoam、Kwiksan 22和Topactive DES能够抑制100%分离株的生长。其余三种消毒剂(Dairy Chlor 12.5%、Envirosan和Maxifoam)对40株大肠杆菌O26分离株无效。最后,大多数分离株(85%)对乙酸、丙酸、乳酸和柠檬酸的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)升高(1024至4096μg/ml)。
澳大利亚的大肠杆菌O26分离株属于一系列携带不同毒力标记的致病型。尽管如此,它们对抗菌剂、消毒剂和酸的反应相似,这证实应激反应似乎与EHEC毒力标记的存在无关。尽管如此,本研究中检测的EHEC和其他大肠杆菌O26致病型对消毒剂的耐受性以及酸MIC升高可能有助于该菌在食品接触表面定殖,并导致随后由该病原体引起的食源性疾病。