Zhang Zeqing, Chen Xi, Lu Puhan, Zhang Jianhua, Xu Yongping, He Wentao, Li Mengni, Zhang Shujun, Jia Jing, Shao Shiying, Xie Junhui, Yang Yan, Yu Xuefeng
Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Mar 1;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0512-z.
Incretin-based agents, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (GLP-1As), work via GLP-1 receptor for hyperglycemic control directly or indirectly, but have different effect on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. The present study is to evaluate and compare effects of incretin-based agents on CV and pancreatic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and high CV risk.
Six prospective randomized controlled trials (EXMAINE, SAVOR-TIMI53, TECOS, ELIXA, LEADER and SUSTAIN-6), which included three trials for DPP-4Is and three trials for GLP-1As, with 55,248 participants were selected to assess the effect of different categories of incretin-based agents on death, CV outcomes (CV mortality, major adverse CV events, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, heart failure hospitalization), pancreatic events (acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer) as well as on hypoglycemia.
When we evaluated the combined effect of six trials, the results suggested that incretin-based treatment had no significant effect on overall risks of CV and pancreatic outcomes compared with placebo. However, GLP-1As reduced all-cause death (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98) and CV mortality (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97), whereas DPP-4Is had no significant effect on CV outcomes but elevated the risk for acute pancreatitis (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.14-2.72) and hypoglycemia (both any and severe hypoglycemia), while GLP-1As lowered the risk of severe hypoglycemia.
GLP-1As decreased risks of all-cause and CV mortality and severe hypoglycemia, whereas DPP-4Is had no effect on CV outcomes but increased risks in acute pancreatitis and hypoglycemia.
基于肠促胰岛素的药物,包括二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4Is)和胰高血糖素样肽-1激动剂(GLP-1As),通过GLP-1受体直接或间接控制血糖,但对心血管(CV)结局有不同影响。本研究旨在评估和比较基于肠促胰岛素的药物对2型糖尿病(T2DM)且心血管风险高的患者的心血管和胰腺结局的影响。
六项前瞻性随机对照试验(EXMAINE、SAVOR-TIMI53、TECOS、ELIXA、LEADER和SUSTAIN-6),其中包括三项DPP-4Is试验和三项GLP-1As试验,共55248名参与者,被选来评估不同类别的基于肠促胰岛素的药物对死亡、心血管结局(心血管死亡率、主要不良心血管事件、非致命性心肌梗死、非致命性中风、心力衰竭住院)、胰腺事件(急性胰腺炎和胰腺癌)以及低血糖的影响。
当我们评估六项试验的综合效应时,结果表明与安慰剂相比,基于肠促胰岛素的治疗对心血管和胰腺结局的总体风险没有显著影响。然而,GLP-1As降低了全因死亡(RR = 0.90,95%CI 0.82 - 0.98)和心血管死亡率(RR = 0.84,95%CI 0.73 - 0.97),而DPP-4Is对心血管结局没有显著影响,但增加了急性胰腺炎(OR = 1.76,95%CI 1.14 - 2.72)和低血糖(任何低血糖和严重低血糖)的风险,而GLP-1As降低了严重低血糖的风险。
GLP-1As降低了全因和心血管死亡率以及严重低血糖的风险,而DPP-4Is对心血管结局没有影响,但增加了急性胰腺炎和低血糖的风险。