Cejalvo Juan M, Martínez de Dueñas Eduardo, Galván Patricia, García-Recio Susana, Burgués Gasión Octavio, Paré Laia, Antolín Silvia, Martinello Rosella, Blancas Isabel, Adamo Barbara, Guerrero-Zotano Ángel, Muñoz Montserrat, Nucíforo Paolo, Vidal María, Pérez Ramón M, Chacón López-Muniz José I, Caballero Rosalía, Peg Vicente, Carrasco Eva, Rojo Federico, Perou Charles M, Cortés Javier, Adamo Vincenzo, Albanell Joan, Gomis Roger R, Lluch Ana, Prat Aleix
Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Oncology Program, Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain.
Cancer Res. 2017 May 1;77(9):2213-2221. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2717. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
Biological changes that occur during metastatic progression of breast cancer are still incompletely characterized. In this study, we compared intrinsic molecular subtypes and gene expression in 123 paired primary and metastatic tissues from breast cancer patients. Intrinsic subtype was identified using a PAM50 classifier and χ tests determined the differences in variable distribution. The rate of subtype conversion was 0% in basal-like tumors, 23.1% in HER2-enriched (HER2-E) tumors, 30.0% in luminal B tumors, and 55.3% in luminal A tumors. In 40.2% of cases, luminal A tumors converted to luminal B tumors, whereas in 14.3% of cases luminal A and B tumors converted to HER2-E tumors. We identified 47 genes that were expressed differentially in metastatic versus primary disease. Metastatic tumors were enriched for proliferation-related and migration-related genes and diminished for luminal-related genes. Expression of proliferation-related genes were better at predicting overall survival in metastatic disease (OSmet) when analyzed in metastatic tissue rather than primary tissue. In contrast, a basal-like gene expression signature was better at predicting OSmet in primary disease compared with metastatic tissue. We observed correlations between time to tumor relapse and the magnitude of changes of proliferation, luminal B, or HER2-E signatures in metastatic versus primary disease. Although the intrinsic subtype was largely maintained during metastatic progression, luminal/HER2-negative tumors acquired a luminal B or HER2-E profile during metastatic progression, likely reflecting tumor evolution or acquisition of estrogen independence. Overall, our analysis revealed the value of stratifying gene expression by both cancer subtype and tissue type, providing clinicians more refined tools to evaluate prognosis and treatment. .
乳腺癌转移进展过程中发生的生物学变化仍未完全明确。在本研究中,我们比较了123例乳腺癌患者配对的原发组织和转移组织中的内在分子亚型及基因表达情况。使用PAM50分类器确定内在亚型,χ检验确定变量分布的差异。基底样肿瘤的亚型转化率为0%,HER2富集(HER2-E)肿瘤为23.1%,管腔B型肿瘤为30.0%,管腔A型肿瘤为55.3%。在40.2%的病例中,管腔A型肿瘤转化为管腔B型肿瘤,而在14.3%的病例中,管腔A型和B型肿瘤转化为HER2-E肿瘤。我们鉴定出47个在转移灶与原发灶中差异表达的基因。转移瘤中增殖相关和迁移相关基因富集,管腔相关基因减少。在转移组织中分析时,增殖相关基因的表达在预测转移疾病的总生存期(OSmet)方面比在原发组织中更好。相反,与转移组织相比,基底样基因表达特征在预测原发疾病的OSmet方面更好。我们观察到肿瘤复发时间与转移灶与原发灶中增殖、管腔B或HER2-E特征变化幅度之间的相关性。尽管内在亚型在转移进展过程中基本保持,但管腔/HER2阴性肿瘤在转移进展过程中获得了管腔B或HER2-E特征,这可能反映了肿瘤的进化或雌激素非依赖性的获得。总体而言,我们的分析揭示了按癌症亚型和组织类型对基因表达进行分层的价值,为临床医生提供了更精细的工具来评估预后和治疗。