Sweeney Carol, Bernard Philip S, Factor Rachel E, Kwan Marilyn L, Habel Laurel A, Quesenberry Charles P, Shakespear Kaylynn, Weltzien Erin K, Stijleman Inge J, Davis Carole A, Ebbert Mark T W, Castillo Adrienne, Kushi Lawrence H, Caan Bette J
Authors' Affiliations: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine; Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah; The Associated Regional and University Pathologist Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, Utah; and Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 May;23(5):714-24. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1023. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
Data are lacking to describe gene expression-based breast cancer intrinsic subtype patterns for population-based patient groups.
We studied a diverse cohort of women with breast cancer from the Life After Cancer Epidemiology and Pathways studies. RNA was extracted from 1 mm punches from fixed tumor tissue. Quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR was conducted for the 50 genes that comprise the PAM50 intrinsic subtype classifier.
In a subcohort of 1,319 women, the overall subtype distribution based on PAM50 was 53.1% luminal A, 20.5% luminal B, 13.0% HER2-enriched, 9.8% basal-like, and 3.6% normal-like. Among low-risk endocrine-positive tumors (i.e., estrogen and progesterone receptor positive by immunohistochemistry, HER2 negative, and low histologic grade), only 76.5% were categorized as luminal A by PAM50. Continuous-scale luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and normal-like scores from PAM50 were mutually positively correlated. Basal-like score was inversely correlated with other subtypes. The proportion with non-luminal A subtype decreased with older age at diagnosis, P Trend < 0.0001. Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, African American women were more likely to have basal-like tumors, age-adjusted OR = 4.4 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 2.3-8.4], whereas Asian and Pacific Islander women had reduced odds of basal-like subtype, OR = 0.5 (95% CI, 0.3-0.9).
Our data indicate that over 50% of breast cancers treated in the community have luminal A subtype. Gene expression-based classification shifted some tumors categorized as low risk by surrogate clinicopathologic criteria to higher-risk subtypes.
Subtyping in a population-based cohort revealed distinct profiles by age and race.
缺乏针对基于人群的患者群体描述基于基因表达的乳腺癌内在亚型模式的数据。
我们研究了来自癌症流行病学与途径研究(Life After Cancer Epidemiology and Pathways studies)中不同的乳腺癌女性队列。从固定肿瘤组织的1毫米打孔样本中提取RNA。对构成PAM50内在亚型分类器的50个基因进行定量逆转录聚合酶链反应。
在1319名女性的亚队列中,基于PAM50的总体亚型分布为:腔面A型占53.1%,腔面B型占20.5%,HER2富集型占13.0%,基底样型占9.8%,正常样型占3.6%。在低风险内分泌阳性肿瘤(即免疫组织化学显示雌激素和孕激素受体阳性、HER2阴性且组织学分级低)中,只有76.5%被PAM50分类为腔面A型。PAM50的连续尺度腔面A型、腔面B型、HER2富集型和正常样型评分相互呈正相关。基底样型评分与其他亚型呈负相关。非腔面A型亚型的比例随诊断时年龄的增加而降低,P趋势<0.0001。与非西班牙裔白人相比,非裔美国女性更有可能患有基底样肿瘤,年龄调整后的比值比(OR)=4.4[95%置信区间(CI),2.3 - 8.4],而亚洲和太平洋岛民女性患基底样亚型的几率降低,OR = 0.5(95%CI,0.3 - 0.9)。
我们的数据表明,社区中接受治疗的乳腺癌超过50%为腔面A型亚型。基于基因表达的分类将一些通过替代临床病理标准分类为低风险的肿瘤转移到了高风险亚型。
基于人群的队列中的亚型分析揭示了按年龄和种族划分的不同特征。