Duell Daisy, Koolman Xander, Portrait France
Talma Institute, Department of Health Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):1728-1742. doi: 10.1002/hec.3494. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
Universal access and generous coverage are important goals of the Dutch long-term care (LTC) system. It is a legal requirement that everyone eligible for LTC should be able to receive it. Institutional care (IC) made up for 90% of Dutch LTC spending. To investigate whether access to IC is as equitable as the Dutch government aspires, we explored practice variation in entitlements to IC across Dutch regions. We used a unique dataset that included all individual applications for Dutch LTC in January 2010-December 2013 (N = 3,373,358). This dataset enabled an accurate identification of the need for care. We examined the local variation in the probability of being granted long-term IC and in the intensity of the care granted given that individuals have applied for LTC. We also investigated whether the variation observed was related to differences in the local availability of care facilities. Although our analyses indicated the presence of some practice variation, its magnitude was very small by national and international standards (up to 3%). Only a minor part of the practice variation could be accounted for by local supply differences in care facilities. Overall, we conclude that, unlike many other developed countries, the Dutch system ensured equitable access to long-term IC.
全民可及和广泛覆盖是荷兰长期护理(LTC)体系的重要目标。法律规定,每个符合长期护理资格的人都应能够获得该服务。机构护理(IC)占荷兰长期护理支出的90%。为了调查获得机构护理的机会是否如荷兰政府所期望的那样公平,我们探究了荷兰各地区在机构护理资格方面的实践差异。我们使用了一个独特的数据集,其中包括2010年1月至2013年12月期间所有荷兰长期护理的个人申请(N = 3,373,358)。这个数据集能够准确识别护理需求。我们研究了在个人申请长期护理的情况下,获得长期机构护理的概率以及所给予护理强度的地区差异。我们还调查了观察到的差异是否与当地护理设施的可及性差异有关。尽管我们的分析表明存在一些实践差异,但按照国内和国际标准,其幅度非常小(高达3%)。护理设施的当地供应差异只能解释一小部分实践差异。总体而言,我们得出结论,与许多其他发达国家不同,荷兰体系确保了公平获得长期机构护理的机会。