• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理的州支出差异:与更平衡体系相关的因素。

Variation in state spending for long-term care: factors associated with more balanced systems.

作者信息

Kane R L, Kane R A, Ladd R C, Veazie W N

机构信息

University of Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 1998 Apr;23(2):363-90. doi: 10.1215/03616878-23-2-363.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-23-2-363
PMID:9565897
Abstract

Pressures to turn over responsibility for long-term care to the states will exacerbate the already sizable difference in such efforts. This article describes the nature of the interstate variation in the types and amounts of long-term care provided under Medicaid. The average Medicaid long-term care expenditure on persons sixty-five years and older varies from $2,720 in New York to $380 in Arizona. Likewise, payments for home and community-based services (HCBS) vary from $1,180 in New York to $29 in Mississippi. Only a modest portion (28 percent) of the variance in total long-term care expenditures appears to be related to differences in population characteristics, and even less (7 percent) appears to be related to differences in HCBS expenditures. When supply factors (e.g., nursing home beds) are added, the explained variance increases to 52 percent and 17 percent, respectively. Medicare replaces some--but not most--of the difference in Medicaid home and community-based services payments.

摘要

将长期护理责任移交给各州的压力将加剧此类努力中已然相当大的差异。本文描述了在医疗补助计划下提供的长期护理类型和数量方面州际差异的性质。医疗补助计划为65岁及以上人群的长期护理平均支出从纽约的2720美元到亚利桑那州的380美元不等。同样,家庭和社区服务(HCBS)的支付从纽约的1180美元到密西西比州的29美元不等。长期护理总支出中只有一小部分(28%)的差异似乎与人口特征差异有关,与家庭和社区服务支出差异相关的则更少(7%)。当加入供应因素(如疗养院床位)时,可解释的差异分别增加到52%和17%。医疗保险弥补了医疗补助计划在家庭和社区服务支付方面的一些差异,但不是大部分。

相似文献

1
Variation in state spending for long-term care: factors associated with more balanced systems.长期护理的州支出差异:与更平衡体系相关的因素。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1998 Apr;23(2):363-90. doi: 10.1215/03616878-23-2-363.
2
Health Care Expenditures After Initiating Long-term Services and Supports in the Community Versus in a Nursing Facility.在社区与护理机构开始接受长期服务和支持后的医疗保健支出。
Med Care. 2016 Mar;54(3):221-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000491.
3
Predictors of low-care prevalence in Florida nursing homes: the role of Medicaid waiver programs.佛罗里达州养老院低护理率的预测因素:医疗补助豁免计划的作用。
Gerontologist. 2011 Aug;51(4):495-503. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr020. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
4
Comparison of resource utilization for Medicaid dementia patients using nursing homes versus home and community based waivers for long-term care.使用养老院与基于家庭和社区的豁免计划为医疗补助痴呆症患者提供长期护理的资源利用情况比较。
Med Care. 2008 Apr;46(4):449-53. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181621eae.
5
The effects of state-level expenditures for home- and community-based services on the risk of becoming a long-stay nursing home resident after hip fracture.州级家庭和社区服务支出对髋部骨折后成为长期疗养院居民风险的影响。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Mar;27(3):953-961. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3327-3. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
6
The Impact of Certificate-of-Need Laws on Nursing Home and Home Health Care Expenditures.需求证明法对疗养院和家庭医疗保健支出的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2016 Feb;73(1):85-105. doi: 10.1177/1077558715597161. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
7
Does home- and community-based care affect nursing home use?家庭和社区护理是否会影响养老院的使用?
J Aging Soc Policy. 2013;25(2):146-60. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2013.766069.
8
Risk of nursing home admission among older americans: does states' spending on home- and community-based services matter?美国老年人入住养老院的风险:各州在居家和社区服务上的支出重要吗?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 May;62(3):S169-78. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.3.s169.
9
Medicaid community-based programs: a longitudinal analysis of state variation in expenditures and utilization.医疗补助社区项目:对各州支出与使用情况差异的纵向分析
Inquiry. 2003 Winter;40(4):375-89. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_40.4.375.
10
HCBS Spending and Nursing Home Admissions for 1915(c) Waiver Enrollees.1915(c) 豁免参保人的居家和社区基础服务支出及疗养院入院情况
J Aging Soc Policy. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(5):395-412. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2017.1319714. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Nursing home admissions for persons with dementia: Role of home- and community-based services.疗养院收治痴呆症患者:家庭和社区服务的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56(6):1168-1178. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13715. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
2
Comparative effectiveness analysis of Medicare dialysis facility survey processes.医疗保险透析机构调查流程的比较效果分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 26;14(4):e0216038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216038. eCollection 2019.
3
Practice variation in the Dutch long-term care and the role of supply-sensitive care: Is access to the Dutch long-term care equitable?
荷兰长期护理中的实践差异与供应敏感型护理的作用:荷兰长期护理的可及性是否公平?
Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):1728-1742. doi: 10.1002/hec.3494. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
4
Improving direct-care compensation in nursing homes: Medicaid wage pass-through adoption, 1999-2004.提高养老院直接护理人员薪酬:医疗补助工资转付模式的采用,1999-2004 年。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2012 Jun;37(3):469-512. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1573094. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
5
Relations among home- and community-based services investment and nursing home rates of use for working-age and older adults: a state-level analysis.居家和社区服务投资与工作年龄和老年人使用养老院率之间的关系:一项州级分析。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Sep;101(9):1735-41. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300163. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
6
Functional declines, social support, and mental health in the elderly: does living in a state supportive of home and community-based services make a difference?老年人的功能下降、社会支持和心理健康:生活在一个支持家庭和社区服务的州是否有区别?
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Apr;70(7):1050-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.005. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
7
Place of death among older Americans: does state spending on home- and community-based services promote home death?美国老年人的死亡地点:各州在家庭和社区服务上的支出是否能促进在家中死亡?
Med Care. 2008 Aug;46(8):829-38. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181791a79.
8
Risk of nursing home admission among older americans: does states' spending on home- and community-based services matter?美国老年人入住养老院的风险:各州在居家和社区服务上的支出重要吗?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 May;62(3):S169-78. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.3.s169.
9
Ranking the 'balance' of state long-term care systems: a comparative exposition of the SMARTER and CaRBS Techniques.对各州长期护理系统的“平衡”进行排名:SMARTER和CaRBS技术的比较阐述
Health Care Manag Sci. 2005 May;8(2):157-66. doi: 10.1007/s10729-005-0398-2.
10
Explaining the diffusion of Medicaid home care waiver programs using VPRS decision rules.使用可变精度粗糙集(VPRS)决策规则解释医疗补助家庭护理豁免计划的扩散情况。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2004 Aug;7(3):237-44. doi: 10.1023/b:hcms.0000039386.59886.dd.