Suppr超能文献

医学院入学面试受访者报告的内容分析

A Content Analysis of Interviewee Reports of Medical School Admissions Interviews.

作者信息

Rippentrop A Elizabeth, Yung-Sang Wong Matthew, Altmaier Elizabeth M

机构信息

a Division of Psychological and Quantitative Foundations College of Education University of Iowa.

b Division of Psychological and Quantitative Foundations, College of Education, and Department of Community and Behavioral Health College of Public Health University of Iowa.

出版信息

Med Educ Online. 2003 Dec;8(1):4333. doi: 10.3402/meo.v8i.4333.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Prospective medical school applicants use Internet websites to gain information about medical school interviews as well as to offer their experience in such interviews. This study examined applicants' reported experiences of interviews and compared them to the purposes of the interview as purported by medical schools.

METHOD

Content analysis of student feedback regarding medical school interviews at 161 medical schools was conducted for entries of over 4600 students applying to medical school who anonymously and voluntarily completed an online questionnaire.

RESULTS

Across all medical schools, nearly one half of all cited interview questions addressed noncognitive characteristics of the applicants. Top ranked medical schools were reported to ask significantly more interpersonal and illegal questions and fewer academic/general knowledge questions than other medical schools. Lower ranked schools did not differ significantly in the types of questions reportedly asked applicants compared to other medical schools.

DISCUSSION

Medical school interviews are generally gathering types of information about applicants that admissions personnel identify as important in the admission decision. In addition to measuring interpersonal characteristics, medical school admissions interviews are assessing cognitive abilities and ethical decision-making. Sources on the Internet provide actual medical school interview questions to prospective students. This practice can help them gain an undue advantage in interviewing. Admissions committees and faculty who interview students may want to consider how best to obtain accurate and valid responses from applicants.

摘要

引言

未来的医学院申请者通过互联网网站获取有关医学院面试的信息,并分享他们在这类面试中的经历。本研究调查了申请者所报告的面试经历,并将其与医学院声称的面试目的进行比较。

方法

对161所医学院的学生关于医学院面试的反馈进行内容分析,这些反馈来自4600多名申请医学院的学生,他们匿名且自愿完成了一份在线问卷。

结果

在所有医学院中,近一半被提及的面试问题涉及申请者的非认知特征。据报道,排名靠前的医学院比其他医学院询问更多关于人际交往和违规的问题,而询问学术/常识问题较少。与其他医学院相比,排名靠后的学校在据报道向申请者提出的问题类型上没有显著差异。

讨论

医学院面试通常收集招生人员认为在录取决定中很重要的有关申请者的各类信息。除了衡量人际交往特征外,医学院招生面试还在评估认知能力和道德决策能力。互联网上的资料为未来的学生提供实际的医学院面试问题。这种做法可能会帮助他们在面试中获得不当优势。面试学生的招生委员会和教员可能需要考虑如何最好地从申请者那里获得准确有效的回答。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验