Regional differences in insulin therapy regimens in five European countries .

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to investigate differences of insulin therapy regimens in five European countries.

METHODS

Proportions of basal bolus therapy (intensified insulin therapy (ICT), basal insulin supported oral therapy (BOT), conventional therapy (CT), and short-acting prandial insulin (SIT) among insulin-treated diabetes patients in Germany (n = 64,055), the UK (n = 6,740), and France (n = 4,779) were estimated using representative general medicine practice databases (Disease Analyzer: 2014). Insulin regimens in Hungary (n = 40,769) and Poland (n = 68,136) were analyzed based on nationwide prescription databases (LRx: 2014).

RESULTS

ICT was the most frequent insulin regimen (46 - 81%) in all countries except France (BOT > ICT). SIT showed the lowest use, ranging from 2.5% in the UK to 11.2% in Germany. BOT was more frequently used than CT in Germany and Hungary, which was just the opposite in the UK and Poland. The share of insulin analogs among all prescriptions was higher in Germany, the UK, and France (short-acting insulins: 59 - 98%; basal insulins: 70 - 93%) than in Hungary and Poland (short-acting insulins: 41 - 57%; basal insulins: 23 - 46%) (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Despite national and international guidelines, insulin regimens differ substantially between European countries. Our results most likely reflect differences in regulations and reimbursement systems, national diabetes care systems as well as patient characteristics and expectations.
.