Zanton G I, Heinrichs A J
USDA-Agricultural Research Service, US Dairy Forage Research Center, Madison, WI 53706.
Department of Animal Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802.
J Dairy Sci. 2017 May;100(5):3718-3724. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12037. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of level of forage and N intake on glucose kinetics in growing dairy heifers. Eight Holstein heifers (beginning at 362 ± 7 kg of body weight and 12.3 ± 0.4 mo of age) were fed 8 rations according to a split-plot, 4 × 4 Latin square design with rations containing either high (75% forage dry matter) or low (25% forage dry matter) levels of forage and 4 levels of N intake (0.94, 1.62, 2.30, 2.96 g of N/kg of metabolic body weight per day). Diets were limit-fed to maintain equal predicted metabolizable energy intake over the four 28-d periods; dietary N was increased through the substitution of high-N ingredients for corn. Blood samples were collected from all heifers at times throughout d 18 to 19 to characterize glucose concentration over the course of a day, and glucose tolerance tests were conducted over the last 8 d of each period (1 heifer/d) at 4 h before feeding. Glucose concentration transiently declined after feeding for all dietary groups, but we found no evidence of a differential response over time that could be attributed to diet. When averaged over a day, glucose concentration was affected by an interaction between level of forage and N intake; however, this response appeared related more to the level of starch in the diet than to the effects of either forage or N intake per se. Early-phase kinetic response of glucose disposal after an intravenous glucose bolus was not affected by dietary treatment, which is consistent with no difference in area under the curve through 30 min. Area under the curve through 120 min tended to linearly decrease with decreasing dietary N intake. This response corresponded to the kinetic analysis, in which heifers consuming higher N intake had an attenuated return to baseline glucose levels. Additionally, heifers consuming lower N intake maintained a period of glucose concentration below baseline before returning to baseline. We concluded that the response to an intravenous glucose bolus differs in dairy heifers fed diets differing in N intake, whereas forage level did not affect this response. This should be considered when formulating rations for low N intake by replacing high-N for high-starch feedstuffs when limit-feeding dairy heifers.
本研究的目的是评估饲料水平和氮摄入量对生长中的奶牛小母牛葡萄糖动力学的影响。八头荷斯坦小母牛(初始体重362±7千克,年龄12.3±0.4月龄)按照裂区4×4拉丁方设计饲喂8种日粮,日粮含有高(75%饲料干物质)或低(25%饲料干物质)水平的饲料以及4个氮摄入量水平(每天0.94、1.62、2.30、2.96克氮/千克代谢体重)。日粮进行限量饲喂,以在四个28天周期内维持相等的预测可代谢能量摄入量;通过用高氮成分替代玉米来增加日粮中的氮。在第18至19天期间,在不同时间从所有小母牛采集血样,以表征一天中葡萄糖浓度的变化情况,并在每个周期的最后8天(每天1头小母牛)饲喂前4小时进行葡萄糖耐量试验。所有日粮组在进食后葡萄糖浓度均短暂下降,但我们没有发现随时间变化的差异反应可归因于日粮的证据。当在一天内进行平均时,葡萄糖浓度受到饲料水平和氮摄入量之间相互作用的影响;然而,这种反应似乎更多地与日粮中淀粉水平有关,而不是与饲料或氮摄入量本身的影响有关。静脉注射葡萄糖推注后葡萄糖处置的早期动力学反应不受日粮处理的影响,这与30分钟内曲线下面积无差异一致。120分钟内的曲线下面积倾向于随着日粮氮摄入量的降低而呈线性下降。这种反应与动力学分析一致,即摄入较高氮的小母牛恢复到基线葡萄糖水平的速度减缓。此外,摄入较低氮的小母牛在恢复到基线之前,有一段时间葡萄糖浓度低于基线。我们得出结论,饲喂不同氮摄入量日粮的奶牛小母牛对静脉注射葡萄糖推注的反应不同,而饲料水平不影响这种反应。在为限量饲喂的奶牛小母牛配制低氮摄入量日粮时,通过用高淀粉饲料替代高氮饲料来考虑这一点。